ArticleJournal of medical systems2012
Accurate prediction of coronary artery disease using reliable diagnosis system.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning-based long-term outcome prediction in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2021Article
- Quantitative Analysis Methods Using Histogram and Entropy for Detector Performance Evaluation According to the Sensitivity Change of the Automatic Exposure Control in Digital Radiography.Journal of medical systems · 2020Article
- Early Detection of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction Using Perioperative Data Among Noncardiac Surgical Patients: A Machine-Learning Approach.Anesthesia and analgesia · 2020Observational
- Coronary Heart Disease Preoperative Gesture Interactive Diagnostic System Based on Augmented Reality.Journal of medical systems · 2017Article
- A Visualization System for Interactive Exploration of the Cardiac Anatomy.Journal of medical systems · 2016Article
- Novel Approaches for Diagnosing Melanoma Skin Lesions Through Supervised and Deep Learning Algorithms.Journal of medical systems · 2016Article
- DWT-based segmentation method for coronary arteries.Journal of medical systems · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents more accurate and reliable computational methods for aiding the treatment of people with coronary artery disease. New techniques are introduced for improved evaluation and distinguish cardiac disease affected patients from the healthy controls. Experiments are conducted with high level of error tolerance rate and confidence level at 95% and 99% and established the results with corrected T-tests based on comparison of various performance measures. Normal kernel density estimator is used for visual distinction of cardiac controls. A new ensemble learning method comprising of Bayesian network as classifier and Principal components method as the projection filter with ranker search is used for the relevant feature selection. Analysis of each model is performed and discusses major findings and concludes with promising results compared to the related works. Multiple Correspondence analysis is used for exploring heart disease variable's relationships. Robust machine learning algorithms used are Rotation forests, MultiBoosting, Sparse multinomial logistic regression for better performance with fine tuning of their involved parameters. The work aims at improving the software reliability and quality of diagnosis of cardiac disease with robust inference system. To the best of our knowledge, from the literature survey, experimental results presented in this work show best results with supportive statistical inference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.