ArticleSteroids2012
The terminal substituents of 7α, 6-hexanyl derivatives of estradiol determine their selective estrogen receptor modulator versus agonist activities.
Article in Steroids, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antiestrogens: structure-activity relationships and use in breast cancer treatment.Journal of molecular endocrinology · 2017Review
- Synthesis of novel estrogen receptor antagonists using metal-catalyzed coupling reactions and characterization of their biological activity.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Pure antiestrogens were clinically developed as alternative therapies for estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancers. Unlike the selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), these antiestrogens are devoid of tissue-specific ER agonist activity. Many of these compounds are steroidal in nature, containing an estradiol (E2) structural core with long alkyl side chains at the C-7α position. Two novel 7α-substituted E2 derivatives were evaluated that retain high binding affinity for ER. Compared to known pure antiestrogens, these compounds, referred to as compound 13 (C13) and C14, contain shorter 7α alkyl side chains and differ only in their terminal substituent: a hydroxyl moiety versus a benzyloxy group, respectively. Herein we assessed the effects of these compounds on ER transcriptional activity and report that despite their similar overall structure, C13 and C14 produce distinct cell type-specific responses. Of note, C13 functions as a mixed agonist/antagonist in Hela cells, inducing only weak ER transcriptional activity while preventing coactivator recruitment and stabilizing ER expression. However, this compound effectively stimulates ER activity in MCF-7 cells, does not increase ER levels and promotes cell proliferation on par with E2. Conversely, C14 stimulates transcriptional activity in both cell types and enhances ER-coactivator interactions. The activities of both compounds were inhibited by the pure antiestrogen ICI 182,780. Taken together, these results reveal that C13 is a SERM while C14 is an ER agonist, and indicate that the terminal modification of the C-7α hexanyl side chain of these estradiol derivatives is an important determinant of the biocharacter of these ER ligands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.