Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22325595›Full record

ArticleMethods in cell biology2012

Supported native plasma membranes as platforms for the reconstitution and visualization of endocytic membrane budding.

Min Wu, Pietro De Camilli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in cell biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Min WuHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Cell Biology, Program in Cellular Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration and Repair, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Pietro De Camilli

Funding

Yale Diabetes Research CenterP30DK045735 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Richard A Flavell · 1993 to 2026
$44.0M
Yale/NIDA Neuroproteomics Research CenterP30DA018343 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Marina R Picciotto · 2004 to 2026
$37.1M
MOLECULAR MECHANISMS IN SYNAPTIC VESICLE RECYCLINGR01NS036251 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI DE CAMILLI, PIETRO · 1997 to 2021
$4.7M
Molecular Mechanisms in Synaptic Vesicle RecyclingR37NS036251 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI DE CAMILLI, PIETRO · 2010 to 2016
$2.7M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIDA NIH HHS P30 DA018343NIDDK NIH HHS DK45735NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK045735NINDS NIH HHS NS36251NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS036251NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS036251
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell-free assays represent an important complement to studies in living cells for the elucidation of mechanisms underlying the dynamics of biological membranes, such as budding, fission, and fusion reactions. Here we describe a method for the reconstitution of endocytosis, the process through which cells internalize portions of the plasma membrane along with extracellular material, under conditions that allow the visualization of individual budding events with high spatial and temporal resolution. The method, which is based on the generation of planar plasma membrane sheets attached to a glass substrate and their subsequent incubation with a cytosolic extract, results in a very robust formation of endocytic buds, which upon appropriate conditions undergo fission. The synchronization of the endocytic events and the accessibility of the material to a variety of manipulations make this experimental system a powerful tool for the molecular dissection of endocytosis.

Indexed as

EndocytosisAnimalsBrainCell ExtractsCell FractionationCell-Free SystemCell MembraneCells, CulturedClathrin-Coated VesiclesEpithelial CellsHumansMicroscopy, ConfocalModels, BiologicalSonicationCell Extracts

Identifiers

PMID22325595
PMCPMC12020404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.