Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22325205›Full record

ArticleNeuron2012

Molecular microcircuitry underlies functional specification in a basal ganglia circuit dedicated to vocal learning.

Austin T Hilliard, Julie E Miller, Elizabeth R Fraley, Steve Horvath, Stephanie A White

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuron, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Linking the genomic signatures of human beat synchronization and learned song in birds.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Sex-Specific Social Behavior and Amygdala Proteomic Deficits inFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Birdsong as a window into language origins and evolutionary neuroscience.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Austin T HilliardDepartment of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Julie E Miller
Elizabeth R Fraley
Steve Horvath
Stephanie A White
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Neuroendocrinology, Sex Differences, and ReproductionT32HD007228 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ARNOLD, ARTHUR P · 1985 to 2015
$3.9M
Formation and Function of Circuitry for Vocal LearningR01MH070712 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI WHITE, STEPHANIE ANN · 2005 to 2017
$3.1M
Neurogenomics in a Model for Procedural LearningF31MH082533 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI HILLIARD, AUSTIN · 2008 to 2010
$96k
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007228NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH082533NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH070712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Similarities between speech and birdsong make songbirds advantageous for investigating the neurogenetics of learned vocal communication--a complex phenotype probably supported by ensembles of interacting genes in cortico-basal ganglia pathways of both species. To date, only FoxP2 has been identified as critical to both speech and birdsong. We performed weighted gene coexpression network analysis on microarray data from singing zebra finches to discover gene ensembles regulated during vocal behavior. We found ∼2,000 singing-regulated genes comprising three coexpression groups unique to area X, the basal ganglia subregion dedicated to learned vocalizations. These contained known targets of human FOXP2 and potential avian targets. We validated biological pathways not previously implicated in vocalization. Higher-order gene coexpression patterns, rather than expression levels, molecularly distinguish area X from the ventral striato-pallidum during singing. The previously unknown structure of singing-driven networks enables prioritization of molecular interactors that probably bear on human motor disorders, especially those affecting speech.

Indexed as

Vocalization, AnimalAnimalsBasal GangliaComputational BiologyELAV ProteinsFemaleForkhead Transcription FactorsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationHumansMaleNerve Tissue ProteinsNeural PathwaysOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPhosphopyruvate HydrataseSongbirdsELAV ProteinsForkhead Transcription FactorsFOXP2 protein, humanNerve Tissue ProteinsPhosphopyruvate Hydratase

Identifiers

PMID22325205
PMCPMC3278710
OpenAlexW2087093188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.