Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22325146›Full record

ReviewMolecular cancer2012

Wnt signaling pathways in urological cancers: past decades and still growing.

Shahana Majid, Sharanjot Saini, Rajvir Dahiya

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Wnt signaling in cervical cancer?Journal of Cancer · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shahana MajidDepartment of Urology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco and University of California San Francisco, 4150 Clement Street, San Francisco CA 94121, USA.
Sharanjot Saini
Rajvir Dahiya
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Wnt antagonist genes in kidney tumor progression and metastasisR01CA130860 · NCI · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE/RES/EDU · PI DAHIYA, RAJVIR · 2008 to 2012
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01CA130860
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Wnt signaling pathway is involved in a wide range of embryonic patterning events and maintenance of homeostasis in adult tissues. The pathological role of the Wnt pathway has emerged from studies showing a high frequency of specific human cancers associated with mutations that constitutively activate the transcriptional response of these pathways. Constitutive activation of the Wnt signaling pathway is a common feature of solid tumors and contributes to tumor development, progression and metastasis in various cancers. In this review, the Wnt pathway will be covered from the perspective of urological cancers with emphasis placed on the recent published literature. Regulation of the Wnt signaling pathway by microRNAs (miRNA), small RNA sequences that modify gene expression profiles will also be discussed. An improved understanding of the basic genetics and biology of Wnt signaling pathway will provide insights into the development of novel chemopreventive and therapeutic strategies for urological cancers.

Indexed as

Wnt Signaling PathwayAnimalsAntineoplastic Agentsbeta CateninEpigenesis, GeneticHumansMicroRNAsNeoplasm MetastasisUrologic NeoplasmsWnt ProteinsAntineoplastic Agentsbeta CateninMicroRNAsWnt Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22325146
PMCPMC3293036
OpenAlexW2137209273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.