Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22324547›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2012

Prevalence of metabolic syndrome components among the elderly using three different definitions: a cohort study in Finland.

Tuula Saukkonen, Jari Jokelainen, Markku Timonen, Henna Cederberg, Mauri Laakso, Pirjo Härkönen, Sirkka Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi, Ulla Rajala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Validation of the Zung self-rating depression scale (SDS) in older adults.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tuula SaukkonenInstitute of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Finland. tuula.saukkonen@oulu.fi
Jari Jokelainen
Markku Timonen
Henna Cederberg
Mauri Laakso
Pirjo Härkönen
Sirkka Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi
Ulla Rajala

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLimited data are available on the metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its components in elderly people (aged 70 years and over) at population level in Northern Europe. A study was undertaken to investigate the prevalence of MetS and its components in an aging population by using different definitions. DESIGN, SETTING, AND SUBJECTS: A cross-sectional study of 539 inhabitants from Northern Finland (mean age 71.9 years) was conducted to investigate the prevalence of MetS, by using the definitions of MetS by the National Cholesterol Education Panel (NCEP), the modified NCEP (NCEPm), and the International Diabetes Federation (IDF).

main outcome measuresPrevalence of MetS by the NCEP, NCEP modified, and IDF criteria.

resultsOverall, the prevalence of MetS was 24.7%, 35.2%, and 37.2% in men, by NCEP, modified NCEP, and IDF-definitions, respectively. In women the corresponding figures were 20.9%, 33.1%, and 47.8%. Hypertension was the most common component in both men (91.8%) and women (89.0%) by the IDF criteria. Glucose abnormalities were particularly prevalent in men (53.2% by NCEP and 78.4% by IDF criteria).

conclusionsThe most common component was hypertension in both genders. Lower waist-circumference cut-off points of the IDF criteria led to a higher prevalence of MetS particularly in women. Prevalence of MetS varied significantly when measured by different definitions. Nearly half of older women met the IDF definition of MetS, which was more than twofold when compared with NCEP. Clinical practitioners should be aware of the limitations when using set criteria of MetS, in contrast to identifying the individual cardiovascular risk factors and the accumulation of these.

Indexed as

Terminology as TopicAgedCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFinlandHumansMaleMetabolic SyndromePrevalence

Identifiers

PMID22324547
PMCPMC3337527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.