Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22323992›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurogastroenterology and motility2012

Prevalence and predictive factors of fecal incontinence.

Hye-Won Kang, Hye-Kyung Jung, Kyoung-Joo Kwon, Eun-Mi Song, Ju-Young Choi, Seong-Eun Kim, Ki-Nam Shim, Sung-Ae Jung

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. What Is Fecal Incontinence That Urologists Need to Know?International neurourology journal · 2021
    Article
  4. Comparison between high-resolution water-perfused anorectal manometry and THDColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2020
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Evidence-Based Update on Treatments of Fecal Incontinence in Women.Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America · 2016
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Rectal hyposensitivity.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2012
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Constipation is also an important cause of fecal incontinence in old people.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2012
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hye-Won KangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ewha Medical Research Institute, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Hye-Kyung Jung
Kyoung-Joo Kwon
Eun-Mi Song
Ju-Young Choi
Seong-Eun Kim
Ki-Nam Shim
Sung-Ae Jung
Ewha Womans University Medical Center · KREwha Womans University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsMost previous epidemiologic studies about fecal incontinence were performed in specific populations in Korea. We aimed to estimate the prevalence and predictive factors of fecal incontinence in adult Korean population, both men and women aged 20 years and over.

methodsSubjects who had undergone medical check-up for health screening were enrolled. They completed the structured questionnaires, including demographics, gastrointestinal symptoms, medical and social histories, and also about their bowel habits. Logistic regression models were constructed to identify the predictive factors for having fecal incontinence.

resultsAmong the total of 1,149 subjects (mean age, 44.8 ± 10.2 years; 648 males), the overall prevalence of fecal incontinence was 6.4%, while the older group (> 50 years old) showed the higher prevalence than the younger group (≤ 50 years old) (10.4% vs 4.9%, P = 0.001) without gender difference. Most patients had mild fecal incontinence in 78.4%. By multivariate analysis, old ages (Odd ratio [OR], 3.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-5.2; P < 0.001), watery stool (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.5-4.9; P = 0.001) and functional diarrhea (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.4-5.4; P = 0.004) were found to be independent predictors for fecal incontinence.

conclusionsThe prevalence of fecal incontinence in Korean adults was 6.4%, and it was significantly more prevalent in older people without any gender difference. Aging and diarrhea were independent predictive factors of fecal incontinence. Therefore, proper control of the bowel pattern would lead to the prevention of fecal incontinence.

Indexed as

EpidemiologyFecal incontinencePrevalenceRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID22323992
PMCPMC3271259
OpenAlexW2019999074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.