Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22323663›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2012

Phase I study of terameprocol in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma.

Stuart A Grossman, Xiaobu Ye, David Peereboom, Myrna R Rosenfeld, Tom Mikkelsen, Jeffrey G Supko, Serena Desideri, Adult Brain Tumor Consortium

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00404248 (Phase I/II Study of Intravenous Infusion of Tetra-o-Methyl Nordihydroguaiaretic Acid), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00404248 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

Phase I/II Study of Intravenous Infusion of Tetra-o-Methyl Nordihydroguaiaretic Acid (EM-1421) in Subjects With Recurrent High Grade Glioma

TypeinterventionalSponsorSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns HopkinsRan2007 to 2012Enrolled35ConditionsBrain and Central Nervous System TumorsArmsterameprocol, pharmacological study
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. The PolyphenolsMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Stuart A GrossmanSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland 21231, USA. grossman@jhmi.edu
Xiaobu Ye
David Peereboom
Myrna R Rosenfeld
Tom Mikkelsen
Jeffrey G Supko
Serena Desideri
Adult Brain Tumor Consortium
Massachusetts General Hospital · USHarvard University · USSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

NEW APPROACHES TO BRAIN TUMOR THERAPY CNS CONSORTIUMU01CA062475 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GROSSMAN, STUART A · 1994 to 2008
$5.6M
NCI NIH HHS CA-62475
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Terameprocol is a global transcription inhibitor that affects cell division apoptosis, drug resistance, hypoxia responsive genes, and radiation resistance in hypoxia. A multicenter, dose-escalation study was conducted in heavily pretreated patients with recurrent, measurable, high-grade gliomas. Terameprocol was administered intravenously for 5 consecutive days each month and discontinued for toxicity or progression. Patients taking enzyme-inducing antiseizure drugs (EIASDs) were escalated independently. Thirty-five patients with a median Karnofsky performance status of 80, median age of 46 years, and median of 2 prior treatment regimens were accrued. Doses of 750, 1100, 1700, and 2200 mg/day were administered. Terameprocol was reformulated to avoid acidosis related to the excipient and was well tolerated at 1700 mg/day. Hypoxia and interstitial nephritis were noted at 2200 mg/day. Concurrent administration of EIASD did not significantly affect the serum pharmacokinetics of the terameprocol. Although no responses were seen, stable disease was noted in 9 (28%) of 32 evaluable patients, with 5 (13%) continuing treatment for >6 months (≥6, 8, 10, 10, and ≥21 months). The overall median survival was 5.9 months. This phase I study defined the toxicity of terameprocol, determined that EIASDs do not affect its pharmacokinetics, and identified 1700 mg/day as the dose for future studies. Preclinical and human data suggest that this novel transcription inhibitor is worthy of further study. The long-term stability noted in some patients and the lack of associated myelosuppression suggest that terameprocol could be safely combined with radiation and temozolomide in newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnticonvulsantsAntineoplastic AgentsBrain NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleGliomaHumansMaleMasoprocolMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalTreatment OutcomeAnticonvulsantsAntineoplastic AgentsMasoprocolterameprocol

Identifiers

PMID22323663
PMCPMC3309850
OpenAlexW2167970406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.