Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22323071›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2012

Engaging children in genomics research: decoding the meaning of assent in research.

Benjamin S Wilfond, Douglas S Diekema

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Rethinking the "open future" argument against predictive genetic testing of children.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019
    Article
  8. Ethical and Policy Considerations for Genomic Testing in Pediatric Research: The Path Toward Disclosing Individual Research Results.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2019
    Article
  9. Giving adolescents a voice: the types of genetic information adolescents choose to learn and why.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. An Observational Study of Children's Involvement in Informed Consent for Exome Sequencing Research.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2017
    Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Clarifying assent in pediatric research.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2014
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Benjamin S WilfondTreuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA. benjamin.wilfond@seattlechildrens.org
Douglas S Diekema

Funding

INSTITUTE FOR TRANSLATIONAL HEALTH SCIENCE (UL1): BPCAUL1RR025014 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DISIS, MARY L. · 2007 to 2011
$51.5M
Genomic Health Care and the Medically UnderservedP50HG003374 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BURKE, WYLIE G. · 2004 to 2014
$9.8M
Institute of Translational Health SciencesTL1TR000422 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DISIS, MARY L. · 2012 to 2016
$2.1M
Managing Incidental Findings in Human Subjects ResearchR01HG003178 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI WOLF, SUSAN M. · 2005 to 2010
$1.5M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR000422NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025014NHGRI NIH HHS 2-R01-HG003178NHGRI NIH HHS P50 HG003374NHGRI NIH HHS P50-HG-3374NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG003178
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article considers how to approach assent from children for genomics research. We examine the "protection" rationale for assent, which emerged in the context of a historical debate regarding whether it was ever acceptable to subject children to risks of research for the benefit of others. We also consider the "development" rationale for assent, which has been articulated for pediatric clinical practice, as an alternative approach for addressing this issue. We consider these rationales in light of the more recent literature on pediatric assent in the research context, and suggest that "engagement" is a more useful construct. This construct emphasizes that children have development capacities that should be respected and includes a limited role for assent to allow children to protect themselves. Engaging children does not require disclosure of all of the benefits and risks of genomics research that might be conveyed to an adult and may permit a degree of parental control over decisions. Using a construct that emphasizes respect can also justify asking children, as they approach adulthood, about their willingness to participate in ongoing genomics research, and yet also permit research to continue if some cannot be reached to obtain consent.

Indexed as

Research SubjectsBiomedical ResearchChildGenetics, MedicalGenomicsHumansInformed ConsentPediatrics

Identifiers

PMID22323071
PMCPMC6317361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.