Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22322921›Full record

ArticleDiabetologia2012

Delaying progression to type 2 diabetes among high-risk Spanish individuals is feasible in real-life primary healthcare settings using intensive lifestyle intervention.

B Costa, F Barrio, J-J Cabré, J-L Piñol, X Cos, C Solé, B Bolíbar, J Basora, C Castell, O Solà-Morales and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetologia, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01519505 (Diabetes in Europe - Prevention Using Lifestyle, Physical Activity and Nutritional Intervention in Catalonia), which is not on this map. Cited by 59 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01519505 naunknown statusnot on this map

Diabetes in Europe - Prevention Using Lifestyle, Physical Activity and Nutritional Intervention in Catalonia(DE-PLAN-CAT).

TypeinterventionalSponsorFundacio d'Investigacio en Atencio Primaria Jordi Gol i GurinaRan2005 to 2012Enrolled2,082ConditionsType 2 Diabetes MellitusArmsLifestyle intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 141 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Atencion primaria · 2018
    Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Guideline
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. A Comprehensive Lifestyle Intervention to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Diseases: the German CHIP Trial.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2016
    Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

B CostaJordi Gol Primary Care Research Institute, Diabetes and Metabolism, Catalan Health Institute, Reus, Tarragona-Barcelona, Spain. costaber@gmail.com
F Barrio
J-J Cabré
J-L Piñol
X Cos
C Solé
B Bolíbar
J Basora
C Castell
O Solà-Morales
J Salas-Salvadó
J Lindström
J Tuomilehto
DE-PLAN-CAT Research Group
Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol · ESGeneralitat de Catalunya · ESFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FIInstitut de Recerca Biomèdica Catalunya Sud · ESUniversität für Weiterbildung Krems · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims/hypothesisTo assess the feasibility and effectiveness of an active real-life primary care lifestyle intervention in preventing type 2 diabetes within a high-risk Mediterranean population.

methodsA prospective cohort study was performed in the setting of Spanish primary care. White-European individuals without diabetes aged 45-75 years (n = 2,054) were screened using the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC) and a subsequent 2 h OGTT. Where feasible, high-risk individuals who were identified were allocated sequentially to standard care, a group-based or an individual level intervention (intensive reinforced DE-PLAN [Diabetes in Europe-Prevention using Lifestyle, Physical Activity and Nutritional] intervention). The primary outcome was the development of diabetes according to WHO criteria. Analyses after 4-year follow-up were performed based on the intention-to-treat principle with comparison of standard care and the combined intervention groups.

resultsThe standard care (n = 219) and intensive intervention (n = 333) groups were comparable in age (62.0/62.2 years), sex (64.4/68.2% women), BMI (31.3/31.2 kg/m(2)), FINDRISC score (16.2/15.8 points), fasting (5.3/5.2 mmol/l), 2 h plasma glucose (7.1/6.9 mmol/l) and self-reported interest to make lifestyle changes at baseline. Diabetes was diagnosed in 124 individuals: 63 (28.8%) in the standard care group and 61 (18.3%) in the intensive intervention group. During a 4.2-year median follow-up, the incidences of diabetes were 7.2 and 4.6 cases per 100 person-years, respectively (36.5% relative risk reduction, p < 0.005). The number of participants needed to be treated by intensive intervention for 4 years to reduce one case of diabetes was 9.5. CONCLUSIONS/

interpretationIntensive lifestyle intervention is feasible in a primary care setting and substantially reduces diabetes incidence among high-risk individuals. CLINICAL

trial registrationClinicalTrial.gov NCT01519505.

fundingCommission of the European Communities, Institute of Health Carlos III, Spanish Ministry of Health and Department of Health, Generalitat de Catalunya.

Indexed as

Risk Reduction BehaviorAgedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Disease ProgressionFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareRiskSpainWhite People

Identifiers

PMID22322921
OpenAlexW1583423426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.