ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2012
Estimating three synaptic conductances in a stochastic neural model.
Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synaptic Conductances during Interictal Discharges in Pyramidal Neurons of Rat Entorhinal Cortex.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2016Article
- Firing clamp: a novel method for single-trial estimation of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic neuronal conductances.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present a method for the reconstruction of three stimulus-evoked time-varying synaptic input conductances from voltage recordings. Our approach is based on exploiting the stochastic nature of synaptic conductances and membrane voltage. Starting with the assumption that the variances of the conductances are known, we use a stochastic differential equation to model dynamics of membrane potential and derive equations for first and second moments that can be solved to find conductances. We successfully apply the new reconstruction method to simulated data. We also explore the robustness of the method as the assumptions of the underlying model are relaxed. We vary the noise levels, the reversal potentials, the number of stimulus repetitions, and the accuracy of conductance variance estimation to quantify the robustness of reconstruction. These studies pave the way for the application of the method to experimental data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22322649What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.