Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22321033›Full record

SynthesisHPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association2012

Laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy in cirrhosis: a systematic review of outcomes and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Jerome M Laurence, Peter D Tran, Arthur J Richardson, Henry C C Pleass, Vincent W T Lam

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection: a meta-analysis of long-term outcome.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2014
    Pooled it
  3. Prevention of bile duct injury - A bird's eye view.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Non-Hepatic Abdominal Surgery in Patients with Cirrhotic Liver Disease.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Hepatobiliary Quiz Answers - 18 (2016).Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology · 2016
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Laparoscopic surgery: A qualified systematic review.World journal of methodology · 2015
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jerome M LaurenceDepartment of Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia. jm_laurence@med.usyd.edu.au
Peter D Tran
Arthur J Richardson
Henry C C Pleass
Vincent W T Lam
The University of Sydney · AUWestmead Hospital · AULiverpool Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCholecystectomy is associated with increased risks in patients with cirrhosis. The well-established advantages of laparoscopic surgery may be offset by the increased risk for complications relating particularly to portal hypertension and coagulopathy.

methodsA systematic search was undertaken to identify studies comparing open cholecystectomy (OC) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in patients with cirrhosis. A meta-analysis was performed of the available randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

resultsForty-four studies were analysed. These included a total of 2005 patients with cirrhosis who underwent laparoscopic (n= 1756) or open (n= 249) cholecystectomy, with mortality rates of 0.74% and 2.00%, respectively. A meta-analysis of three RCTs involving a total of 220 patients was conducted. There was a reduction in the overall incidences of postoperative complications and infectious complications and a shorter length of hospital stay in LC. However, frequencies of postoperative hepatic insufficiency did not differ significantly.

conclusionsThere are few RCTs comparing OC and LC in patients with cirrhosis. These studies are small, heterogeneous in design and include almost exclusively patients with Child-Pugh class A and B disease. However, LC appears to be associated with shorter operative time, reduced complication rates and reduced length of hospital stay.

Indexed as

Cholecystectomy, LaparoscopicChi-Square DistributionCholecystectomyCholelithiasisEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHumansLength of StayLiver CirrhosisMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioPostoperative ComplicationsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID22321033
PMCPMC3371197
OpenAlexW1966120438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.