Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22320313›Full record

SynthesisBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2012

Towards the identification of blood biomarkers for acute stroke in humans: a comprehensive systematic review.

Nazeeha Hasan, Peter McColgan, Paul Bentley, Robert J Edwards, Pankaj Sharma

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Acute Stroke Biomarkers: Are We There Yet?Frontiers in neurology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Nazeeha HasanImperial College Cerebrovascular Research Unit-ICCRU, Division of Experimental Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK.
Peter McColgan
Paul Bentley
Robert J Edwards
Pankaj Sharma
Imperial College London · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsIdentification of biomarkers for stroke will aid our understanding of its aetiology, provide diagnostic and prognostic indicators for patient selection and stratification, and play a significant role in developing personalized medicine. We undertook the largest systematic review conducted to date in an attempt to characterize diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in acute ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke and those likely to predict complications following thrombolysis.

methodsA comprehensive literature search was carried out to identify diagnostic and prognostic stroke blood biomarkers. Mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for each biomarker.

resultsWe identified a total of 141 relevant studies, interrogating 136 different biomarkers. Three biomarkers (C-reactive protein, P-selectin and homocysteine) significantly differentiated between ischaemic stroke and healthy control subjects. Furthermore, glial fibrillary acidic protein levels were significantly different between haemorrhagic stroke and ischaemic stroke patients (MD 224.58 ng l⁻¹; 95% CI 25.84, 423.32; P= 0.03), high levels of admission glucose were a strong predictor of poor prognosis after ischaemic stroke and symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage post-thrombolysis, glutamate was found to be an indicator of progressive (unstable) stroke (MD 172.65 µmol l⁻¹, 95% CI 130.54, 214.75; P= 0.00001), D-dimer predicted in-hospital death (MD 0.67 µg ml⁻¹, 95% CI 0.35, 1.00; P= 0.0001), and high fibrinogen levels were associated with poor outcome at 3 months (MD 47.90 mg l⁻¹, 95% CI 14.88, 80.93; P= 0.004) following ischaemic stroke.

conclusionsFew biomarkers currently investigated have meaningful clinical value. Admission glucose may be a strong marker of poor prognosis following acute thrombolytic treatment. However, molecules released in the bloodstream before, during or after stroke may have potential to be translated into sensitive blood-based tests.

Indexed as

BiomarkersHumansPatient SelectionPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsStrokeBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID22320313
PMCPMC3630743
OpenAlexW1588197618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.