Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22320230›Full record

ArticleLangmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids2012

Charged nanoparticle dynamics in water induced by scanning transmission electron microscopy.

E R White, Matthew Mecklenburg, Brian Shevitski, S B Singer, B C Regan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Liquid Phase TEM of Diffusing Emulsion Droplets.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Analysis of complex, beam-sensitive materials by transmission electron microscopy and associated techniques.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

E R WhiteDepartment of Physics and Astronomy & California NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA.
Matthew Mecklenburg
Brian Shevitski
S B Singer
B C Regan

Funding

UCLA MSD ProgramR25GM055052 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BARBER, PAUL HENRY, HASSON, TAMA W. · 1996 to 2021
$9.2M
HIGH-END CRYOEM INSTRUMENT FOR UCLA ELECTRON IMAGING CTR FOR NANOMACHINES: AIDSS10RR023057 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ZHOU, Z HONG · 2006 to 2006
$1.6M
NCRR NIH HHS 1S10RR23057NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR023057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using scanning transmission electron microscopy we image ~4 nm platinum nanoparticles deposited on an insulating membrane, where the membrane is one of two electron-transparent windows separating an aqueous environment from the microscope's high vacuum. Upon receiving a relatively moderate dose of ~10(4) e/nm(2), initially immobile nanoparticles begin to move along trajectories that are directed radially outward from the center of the field of view. With larger dose rates the particle motion becomes increasingly dramatic. These observations demonstrate that, even under mild imaging conditions, the in situ electron microscopy of aqueous environments can produce electrophoretic charging effects that dominate the dynamics of nanoparticles under observation.

Indexed as

Microscopy, Electron, Scanning TransmissionNanoparticlesWaterWater

Identifiers

PMID22320230
PMCPMC3305795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.