Scientific standards and the regulation of genetically modified insects.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

1. A typology of community and stakeholder engagement based on documented examples in the field of novel vector control.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2019
   Pooled it
2. Is Dengue Vector Control Deficient in Effectiveness or Evidence?: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2016
   Pooled it
3. Willingness to accept and participate in a Microsporidia MB-based mosquito release strategy: a community-based rapid assessment in western Kenya.Malaria journal · 2024
   Article
4. Unigems: plasmids and parts to facilitate teaching on assembly, gene expression control and logic inAccess microbiology · 2023
   Article
5. Effect ofInsects · 2022
   Article
6. Elimination of a closed population of the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti, through releases of self-limiting male mosquitoes.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2022
   Article
7. Oxitec and MosquitoMate in the United States: lessons for the future of gene drive mosquito control.Pathogens and global health · 2021
   Article
8. Hybrid mosquitoes? Evidence from rural Tanzania on how local communities conceptualize and respond to modified mosquitoes as a tool for malaria control.Malaria journal · 2021
   Article
9. A Review:Vaccines · 2021
   Review
10. Synthetic Mutualism and the Intervention Dilemma.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
11. Ethics of community engagement in field trials of genetically modified mosquitoes.Developing world bioethics · 2018
    Article
12. GM insect pests under the Brazilian regulatory framework: development and perspectives.BMC proceedings · 2018
    Review
13. Transcriptional effects of a positive feedback circuit in Drosophila melanogaster.BMC genomics · 2017
    Article
14. Transmission-blocking strategies: the roadmap from laboratory bench to the community.Malaria journal · 2016
    Review
15. Engaging scientists: An online survey exploring the experience of innovative biotechnological approaches to controlling vector-borne diseases.Parasites & vectors · 2015
    Article
16. Aedes aegypti Control Strategies in Brazil: Incorporation of New Technologies to Overcome the Persistence of Dengue Epidemics.Insects · 2015
    Review
17. Factors influencing stakeholders attitudes toward genetically modified aedes mosquito.Science and engineering ethics · 2015
    Article
18. New insight-guided approaches to detect, cure, prevent and eliminate malaria.Protoplasma · 2015
    Review
19. Building Better Environmental Risk Assessments.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2015
    Review
20. Geographic expansion of the invasive mosquito Aedes albopictus across Panama--implications for control of dengue and Chikungunya viruses.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2015
    Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Appropriate regulation of GM insects.2012
• Commented on by
  Science, regulation, and precedent for genetically modified insects.2012

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as