Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22319170›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2012

Evolutionary conservation of histone modifications in mammals.

Yong H Woo, Wen-Hsiung Li

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. A TAD Skeptic: Is 3D Genome Topology Conserved?Trends in genetics : TIG · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Yong H WooDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, The University of Chicago, USA.
Wen-Hsiung Li
University of Chicago · US

Funding

STATISTICAL STUDIES OF DNA EVOLUTIONR37GM030998 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI LI, WEN-HSIUNG · 2000 to 2009
$1.9M
STATISTICAL STUDIES OF DNA EVOLUTIONR01GM030998 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI LI, WEN-HSIUNG · 1985 to 1999
–
NIGMS NIH HHS GM30998NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM030998NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM030998
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Histone modification is an important mechanism of gene regulation in eukaryotes. Why many histone modifications can be stably maintained in the midst of genetic and environmental changes is a fundamental question in evolutionary biology. We obtained genome-wide profiles of three histone marks, H3 lysine 4 tri-methylation (H3K4me3), H3 lysine 4 mono-methylation (H3K4me1), and H3 lysine 27 acetylation (H3K27ac), for several cell types from human and mouse. We identified histone modifications that were stable among different cell types in human and histone modifications that were evolutionarily conserved between mouse and human in the same cell type. We found that histone modifications that were stable among cell types were also likely to be conserved between species. This trend was consistently observed in promoter, intronic, and intergenic regions for all of the histone marks tested. Importantly, the trend was observed regardless of the expression breadth of the nearby gene, indicating that slow evolution of housekeeping genes was not the major reason for the correlation. These regions showed distinct genetic and epigenetic properties, such as clustered transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs), high GC content, and CTCF binding at flanking sides. Based on our observations, we proposed that TFBS clustering in or near a histone modification plays a significant role in stabilizing and conserving the histone modification because TFBS clustering promotes TFBS conservation, which in turn promotes histone modification conservation. In summary, the results of this study support the view that in mammalian genomes a common mechanism maintains histone modifications against both genetic and environmental (cellular) changes.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionHistone CodeAnimalsCCCTC-Binding FactorChromatinEmbryonic Stem CellsGene Expression RegulationGenome-Wide Association StudyHistonesHumansLiverMiceRepressor ProteinsCCCTC-Binding FactorChromatinCTCF protein, humanCtcf protein, mouseHistonesRepressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22319170
PMCPMC3375473
OpenAlexW1964614067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.