Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22319150›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2012

Allelic imbalance in Drosophila hybrid heads: exons, isoforms, and evolution.

R M Graze, L L Novelo, V Amin, J M Fear, G Casella, S V Nuzhdin, L M McIntyre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mechanisms of transcriptional regulation inProceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Mechanisms of transcriptional regulation inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sex-biased expression is associated with chromatin state inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  10. Genome-wide chromatin accessibility analysis unveils open chromatin convergent evolution during polyploidization in cotton.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

R M GrazeDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of Florida, USA.
L L Novelo
V Amin
J M Fear
G Casella
S V Nuzhdin
L M McIntyre

Funding

UF Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000064 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI NELSON, DAVID R · 2012 to 2014
$12.2M
Genetic variation of allele-specific transcriptome in DrosophilaR01GM077618 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MCINTYRE, LAUREN M. · 2007 to 2010
$1.5M
Nucleotide polymorphisms responsible for expression variation in DrosophilaR01GM076643 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI NUZHDIN, SERGEY V · 2006 to 2009
$1.2M
Quantitative Comparisons between genotypes and model speciesR01GM102227 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MCINTYRE, LAUREN M. · 2012 to 2015
$1.2M
Statistical Algorithms for Valid Inferences in Genomic DataR01GM081704 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI YOUNG, LINDA J · 2008 to 2010
$459k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000064NIGMS NIH HHS 5R01GM081704-03NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM076643NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM077618NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081704NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM102227NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM77618NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM77618-S1PHS HHS RGM076643A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unraveling how regulatory divergence contributes to species differences and adaptation requires identifying functional variants from among millions of genetic differences. Analysis of allelic imbalance (AI) reveals functional genetic differences in cis regulation and has demonstrated differences in cis regulation within and between species. Regulatory mechanisms are often highly conserved, yet differences between species in gene expression are extensive. What evolutionary forces explain widespread divergence in cis regulation? AI was assessed in Drosophila melanogaster-Drosophila simulans hybrid female heads using RNA-seq technology. Mapping bias was virtually eliminated by using genotype-specific references. Allele representation in DNA sequencing was used as a prior in a novel Bayesian model for the estimation of AI in RNA. Cis regulatory divergence was common in the organs and tissues of the head with 41% of genes analyzed showing significant AI. Using existing population genomic data, the relationship between AI and patterns of sequence evolution was examined. Evidence of positive selection was found in 30% of cis regulatory divergent genes. Genes involved in defense, RNAi/RISC complex genes, and those that are sex regulated are enriched among adaptively evolving cis regulatory divergent genes. For genes in these groups, adaptive evolution may play a role in regulatory divergence between species. However, there is no evidence that adaptive evolution drives most of the cis regulatory divergence that is observed. The majority of genes showed patterns consistent with stabilizing selection and neutral evolutionary processes.

Indexed as

Allelic ImbalanceEvolution, MolecularExonsAnimalsBayes TheoremChromosome MappingDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsFemaleGene FrequencyHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHybridization, GeneticModels, GeneticProtein IsoformsSelection, GeneticSequence AlignmentDrosophila ProteinsProtein Isoforms

Identifiers

PMID22319150
PMCPMC3351786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.