Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22319113›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2012

High-resolution microrheology in the pericellular matrix of prostate cancer cells.

Nadja Nijenhuis, Daisuke Mizuno, Jos A E Spaan, Christoph F Schmidt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. 3DACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Glycocalyx Curving the Membrane: Forces Emerging from the Cell Exterior.Annual review of cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Mechanotransduction in cancer.Current opinion in chemical engineering · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nadja NijenhuisDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Daisuke Mizuno
Jos A E Spaan
Christoph F Schmidt

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many cells express a membrane-coupled external mechanical layer, the pericellular matrix (PCM), which often contains long-chain polymers. Its role and properties are not entirely known, but its functions are believed to include physical protection, mechanosensing, chemical signalling or lubrication. The viscoelastic response of the PCM, with polysaccharides as the main structural components, is therefore crucial for the understanding of its function. We have here applied microrheology, based on optically trapped micrometre-sized colloids, to the PCM of cultured PC3 prostate cancer cells. This technology allowed us to measure the extremely soft response of the PCM, with approximately 1 µm height resolution. Exogenously added aggrecan, a hyaluronan-binding proteoglycan, caused a remarkable increase in thickness of the viscoelastic layer and also triggered filopodia-like protrusions. The viscoelastic response of the PCM, however, did not change significantly.

Indexed as

Mechanotransduction, CellularSignal TransductionStress, PhysiologicalAggrecansCell Line, TumorElasticityExtracellular MatrixHumansHyaluronan ReceptorsMaleProstatic NeoplasmsRheologyViscosityAggrecansHyaluronan Receptors

Identifiers

PMID22319113
PMCPMC3385749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.