ArticleAspects of applied biology2011
Gaining confidence in cross-species annotation transfer: from simple molecular function to complex phenotypic traits.
Article in Aspects of applied biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Developing integrated crop knowledge networks to advance candidate gene discovery.Applied & translational genomics · 2016Article
- New research tools for urogenital schistosomiasis.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2015Review
- Recent advances in candidate-gene and whole-genome approaches to the discovery of anthelmintic resistance markers and the description of drug/receptor interactions.International journal for parasitology. Drugs and drug resistance · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cross-species annotation transfer is a widely used approach for transferring information about simple molecular functions or pathways from one protein in one species to its ortholog in another species. In crop species, the phenotypic traits of interest, such as grain yield, are very complex and are often related to multiple biological processes and systems. It is still unclear to what extent the high level annotations describing phenotypic traits can also be reliably transferred across species. In this work, we have developed a procedure to measure precisely the transferability of these functional annotations from one species to another and demonstrate its application to Arabidopsis and several crop species. This comparative analysis is a step towards assigning higher level biological function to genes and gene networks as part of the wider genotype to phenotype challenge.
Identifiers
22319070PMC3272443What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.