ReviewPediatric cardiology2012
Sudden cardiac death and malignant arrhythmias: the scope of the problem in adult congenital heart patients.
Review in Pediatric cardiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Novel TBX1 Loss-of-Function Mutation Associated with Congenital Heart Disease.Pediatric cardiology · 2015Article
- A novel NKX2.6 mutation associated with congenital ventricular septal defect.Pediatric cardiology · 2015Article
- PITX2 Loss-of-Function Mutation Contributes to Congenital Endocardial Cushion Defect and Axenfeld-Rieger Syndrome.PloS one · 2015Article
- Adolescents and adults with congenital heart diseases in oman.Oman medical journal · 2015Article
- Heart Rythm Society expert consensus statement on electrophysiology laboratory standards: process, protocols, equipment, personnel, and safety.Heart rhythm · 2014Review
- Prevalence and spectrum of PITX2c mutations associated with congenital heart disease.DNA and cell biology · 2013Article
- Surgical and catheter procedures in adult congenital heart disease: simple national statistics of the UK tell us something.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2013Review
- GATA5 loss-of-function mutation responsible for the congenital ventriculoseptal defect.Pediatric cardiology · 2013Article
- PITX2c loss-of-function mutations responsible for congenital atrial septal defects.International journal of medical sciences · 2013Article
- GATA5 loss-of-function mutations underlie tetralogy of fallot.International journal of medical sciences · 2013Article
- Novel GATA6 mutations associated with congenital ventricular septal defect or tetralogy of fallot.DNA and cell biology · 2012Article
- Are adults with congenital heart disease at risk for the development of heart failure when feeling depressed? An immunological mechanism.Pediatric cardiology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A key component of recognizing sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk in the adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patient is the recognition of heart failure risk for each physiology. The risk of SCD is an accrued phenomenon, representing the influences of anatomy, genetics, surgical and catheter interventions, and long-term sequelae of residual hemodynamic issues. These all lead to a substrate for tachyarrhythmia. It is beneficial in thinking about all of the potential combinations of CHD anatomy and physiologies to categorize SCD risk for the ACHD patient in terms of systemic left-ventricular failure, systemic right-ventricular failure, subpulmonary ventricular failure, the dyssynchronous contractility states due to bundle branch block, and single-site ventricular pacing. This article reviews important issues in arrhythmogenesis for ACHD patients with all of these physiologies and discusses potential cardiac rhythm device-management needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.