Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22318718›Full record

ReviewJournal of biomedicine & biotechnology2012

Proteomics shows new faces for the old penicillin producer Penicillium chrysogenum.

Carlos Barreiro, Juan F Martín, Carlos García-Estrada

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Comparative Proteomic Analysis ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Comparative Genomic Analysis Reveals Key Changes in the Genome ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Species Diversity ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Microorganisms · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Engineering of the Filamentous FungusFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carlos BarreiroProteomics Service of INBIOTEC, Instituto de Biotecnología de León (INBIOTEC), Parque Científico de León, Avenida. Real, No. 1, 24006 León, Spain. c.barreiro@unileon.es
Juan F Martín
Carlos García-Estrada

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fungi comprise a vast group of microorganisms including the Ascomycota (majority of all described fungi), the Basidiomycota (mushrooms or higher fungi), and the Zygomycota and Chytridiomycota (basal or lower fungi) that produce industrially interesting secondary metabolites, such as β-lactam antibiotics. These compounds are one of the most commonly prescribed drugs world-wide. Since Fleming's initial discovery of Penicillium notatum 80 years ago, the role of Penicillium as an antimicrobial source became patent. After the isolation of Penicillium chrysogenum NRRL 1951 six decades ago, classical mutagenesis and screening programs led to the development of industrial strains with increased productivity (at least three orders of magnitude). The new "omics" era has provided the key to understand the underlying mechanisms of the industrial strain improvement process. The review of different proteomics methods applied to P. chrysogenum has revealed that industrial modification of this microorganism was a consequence of a careful rebalancing of several metabolic pathways. In addition, the secretome analysis of P. chrysogenum has opened the door to new industrial applications for this versatile filamentous fungus.

Indexed as

beta-LactamsHumansIndustrial MicrobiologyMetabolic Networks and PathwaysPenicillinsPenicillium chrysogenumbeta-LactamsPenicillins

Identifiers

PMID22318718
PMCPMC3270403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.