Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22318636›Full record

ArticleMycopathologia2012

Susceptibilities to amphotericin B, fluconazole and voriconazole of Trichosporon clinical isolates.

Moan Shane Tsai, Yun Liang Yang, An Huei Wang, Lih Shinn Wang, Daniel C T Lu, Ci Hong Liou, Li Yun Hsieh, Chi Jung Wu, Ming Fang Cheng, Zhi Yuan Shi and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mycopathologia, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Future microbiology · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Emerging Trichosporon asahii in elderly patients: epidemiological and molecular analysis by the DiversiLab system.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2014
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Moan Shane TsaiNational Institute of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan Town, Miaoli County, Taiwan.
Yun Liang Yang
An Huei Wang
Lih Shinn Wang
Daniel C T Lu
Ci Hong Liou
Li Yun Hsieh
Chi Jung Wu
Ming Fang Cheng
Zhi Yuan Shi
Hsiu Jung Lo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A total of 35 Trichosporon isolates were collected from the Taiwan Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance of Yeasts (TSARY) project from 1999 to 2006, and their identifications as well as drug susceptibilities were determined. The most frequently isolated species was T. asahii (62.9%), and the most common clinical sample that yielded Trichosporon isolates was urine (37.1%). The etiology of all seven invasive trichosporonosis was T. asahii. For the 22 T. asahii isolates, the MIC(50) and MIC(90) for amphotericin B were 0.25 and 1 μg/mL, respectively. Those for fluconazole were 2 and 4 μg/mL, respectively, and for voriconazole 0.031 and 0.063 μg/mL, respectively. When the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and agreements were calculated, we found that the MICs of fluconazole obtained from different methods were similar and the inter-method discrepancies were low. Nevertheless, no unanimous MIC of amphotericin B and voriconazole was obtained among different methods.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsFluconazoleHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedPyrimidinesTaiwanTriazolesTrichosporonTrichosporonosisVoriconazoleAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsFluconazolePyrimidinesTriazolesVoriconazole

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.