ArticleMolecular biology reports2012
Gene expression and pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Determinants of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: Integrated roles of immune pathways, DNA damage response, and cell cycle regulators.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Profiling the Expression Level of a Gene from the Caspase Family in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in androgen receptor-positive triple-negative breast cancer: potential predictive biomarkers and genetic alterations.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Article
- Expression of the microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2) as a potential independent prognostic marker in prostate cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Article
- Different impacts of TP53 mutations on cell cycle-related gene expression among cancer types.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Proteomic analysis of gemcitabine-resistant pancreatic cancer cells reveals that microtubule-associated protein 2 upregulation associates with taxane treatment.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2019Article
- Specific breast cancer prognosis-subtype distinctions based on DNA methylation patterns.Molecular oncology · 2018Article
- Article
- Serial expression analysis of breast tumors during neoadjuvant chemotherapy reveals changes in cell cycle and immune pathways associated with recurrence and response.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2015Article
- Interferon regulatory factor-1 signaling regulates the switch between autophagy and apoptosis to determine breast cancer cell fate.Cancer research · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant systemic treatment appears to be a valid surrogate for better overall survival in breast cancer patients. Currently, together with standard clinicopathologic assessment, novel molecular biomarkers are being exhaustively tested in order to look into the heterogeneity of breast cancer. The aim of our study was to examine an association between 23-gene real-time-PCR expression assay including ABCB1, ABCC1, BAX, BBC3, BCL2, CASP3, CYP2D6, ERCC1, FOXC1, GAPDH, IGF1R, IRF1, MAP2, MAPK 8, MAPK9, MKI67, MMP9, NCOA3, PARP1, PIK3CA, TGFB3, TOP2A, and YWHAZ receptor status of breast cancer core biopsies sampled before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (anthracycline and taxanes) and pathologic response. Core-needle biopsies were collected from 42 female patients with inoperable locally advanced breast cancer or resectable tumors suitable for downstaging, before any treatment. Expressions of 23 genes were determined by means of TagMan low density arrays. Analysis of variance was used to select genes with discriminatory potential between receptor subtypes. We introduced a correction for false discovery rates (presented as q values) due to multiple hypothesis testing. Statistical analysis showed that seven genes out of a 23-gene real-time-PCR expression assay differed significantly in relation to pathologic response regardless of breast cancer subtypes. Among these genes, we identified: BAX (p = 0.0146), CYP2D6 (p = 0.0063), ERCC1 (p = 0.0231), FOXC1 (p = 0.0048), IRF1 (p = 0.0022), MAP2 (p = 0.0011), and MKI67 (p = 0.0332). The assessment of core biopsy gene profiles and receptor-based subtypes, before neoadjuvant therapy seems to predict response or resistance and to define new signaling pathways to provide more powerful classifiers in breast cancer, hence the need for further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.