Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22318550›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2012

Gene expression and pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Agnieszka Kolacinska, Wojciech Fendler, Janusz Szemraj, Bozena Szymanska, Ewa Borowska-Garganisz, Magdalena Nowik, Justyna Chalubinska, Robert Kubiak, Zofia Pawlowska, Maria Blasinska-Morawiec and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Agnieszka KolacinskaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Center, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Paderewskiego 4, 93-509 Lodz, Poland. info@drkolacinska.pl
Wojciech Fendler
Janusz Szemraj
Bozena Szymanska
Ewa Borowska-Garganisz
Magdalena Nowik
Justyna Chalubinska
Robert Kubiak
Zofia Pawlowska
Maria Blasinska-Morawiec
Piotr Potemski
Arkadiusz Jeziorski
Zbigniew Morawiec
Medical University of Lodz · PLCopernicus Memorial Hospital · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant systemic treatment appears to be a valid surrogate for better overall survival in breast cancer patients. Currently, together with standard clinicopathologic assessment, novel molecular biomarkers are being exhaustively tested in order to look into the heterogeneity of breast cancer. The aim of our study was to examine an association between 23-gene real-time-PCR expression assay including ABCB1, ABCC1, BAX, BBC3, BCL2, CASP3, CYP2D6, ERCC1, FOXC1, GAPDH, IGF1R, IRF1, MAP2, MAPK 8, MAPK9, MKI67, MMP9, NCOA3, PARP1, PIK3CA, TGFB3, TOP2A, and YWHAZ receptor status of breast cancer core biopsies sampled before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (anthracycline and taxanes) and pathologic response. Core-needle biopsies were collected from 42 female patients with inoperable locally advanced breast cancer or resectable tumors suitable for downstaging, before any treatment. Expressions of 23 genes were determined by means of TagMan low density arrays. Analysis of variance was used to select genes with discriminatory potential between receptor subtypes. We introduced a correction for false discovery rates (presented as q values) due to multiple hypothesis testing. Statistical analysis showed that seven genes out of a 23-gene real-time-PCR expression assay differed significantly in relation to pathologic response regardless of breast cancer subtypes. Among these genes, we identified: BAX (p = 0.0146), CYP2D6 (p = 0.0063), ERCC1 (p = 0.0231), FOXC1 (p = 0.0048), IRF1 (p = 0.0022), MAP2 (p = 0.0011), and MKI67 (p = 0.0332). The assessment of core biopsy gene profiles and receptor-based subtypes, before neoadjuvant therapy seems to predict response or resistance and to define new signaling pathways to provide more powerful classifiers in breast cancer, hence the need for further research.

Indexed as

AnthracyclinesAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyTaxoidsTreatment OutcomeAnthracyclinesBiomarkers, TumorErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesTaxoids

Identifiers

PMID22318550
OpenAlexW1978297697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.