Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22318361›Full record

ArticleDer Nervenarzt2013

[Psychosocial integration of inpatients with borderline personality disorder: reflection of a health care system focused on symptom remission].

D M Gescher, B Will, J Malevani

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

D M GescherKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, LVR-Klinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Bergische Landstr. 2, 40629 Düsseldorf, Deutschland. dorothee.gescher@lvr.de
B Will
J Malevani

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBorderline personality disorder (BPD) is characterized by a profound instability of identity, by stress and affect dysregulation and impulsivity, and by cognitive-perceptual disturbances. These deficits seriously impair interpersonal experiences and social interaction. The typical impulsive style and psychosocial malfunctioning of these patients lead to grave disturbances in their everyday areas of life with numerous break-ups in all relevant areas of life and entail inadequate vocational placement. Despite vast demands on the health care system, BPD attracts little attention of care process research and reintegration measures as, for instance, exist for schizophrenia. At the LVR-Klinikum Düsseldorf as representative of a large clinic in North Rhein-Westphalia, we analysed socio-demographic characteristics of BPD inpatients. The aims of the study were to substantiate the high impact of the disease on patient's social and vocational integration and to sensitize for significant aspects of disease-specific therapy and care.

methodsA retrospective analysis of DGPPN-BADO of all patients (n = 9,425) who were admitted between January 2004 and December 2009 to the LVR-Klinikum Düsseldorf, department of psychiatry and psychotherapy, Heinrich Heine University Hospital, Germany. Data analysis involved the divisions general psychiatry and addictive disorders and covered 999 patients with BPD (ICD-10: F60.3) and 1,937 patients with schizophrenia (ICD-10: F20). The defined characteristics of DGPPN-BADO that depict psychosocial integration were "living situation at admission", "highest academic/professional degree achieved", "working situation" und "livelihood". Besides descriptive statistics of the elected variables, comparative analysis of the diagnoses BPD and schizophrenia involved calculating group differences after adjusting the groups for sex and age. Statistical analysis was performed by the χ2-test.

resultsThe comparative analysis of psychosocially relevant BADO characteristics reveals a significantly stronger impairment of patients with BPD concerning their academic and professional qualification than patients with schizophrenia. Nevertheless they more often hold a job or cover their living expenses without subsidy, respectively.

conclusionThe data suggest a lack of general awareness in the significance of social and vocational disturbances in BPD. The interactional deficits of patients with BPD affect all areas of life but their illness-related nature seems to be disregarded in relevant life areas, such as educational processes and the vocational situation. Furthermore, the impact of BPD on earning capacity is not given adequate consideration in the assessment of pensions or subsidies. Consistent with the recent literature, our socio-demographic data indicate significant deficits of the present health system in handling BPD.

Indexed as

Educational StatusEmploymentAdultBorderline Personality DisorderComorbidityFemaleGermanyHospitalizationHumansInpatientsMaleMental Health ServicesMiddle AgedPrevalenceQuality of LifeRisk Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.