Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22318197›Full record

Trial reportNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2012

Modulation of social influence by methylphenidate.

Daniel K Campbell-Meiklejohn, Arndis Simonsen, Mads Jensen, Victoria Wohlert, Trine Gjerløff, Jørgen Scheel-Kruger, Arne Møller, Chris D Frith, Andreas Roepstorff

Erratum issuedAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Social brains on drugs: tools for neuromodulation in social neuroscience.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2014
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Majority influence in children and other animals.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daniel K Campbell-MeiklejohnCenter for Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. dan.cfin@gmail.com
Arndis Simonsen
Mads Jensen
Victoria Wohlert
Trine Gjerløff
Jørgen Scheel-Kruger
Arne Møller
Chris D Frith
Andreas Roepstorff

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to infer value from the reactions of other people is a common and essential ability with a poorly understood neurobiology. Commonly, social learning matches one's values and behavior to what is perceived as normal for one's social group. This is known as conformity. Conformity of value correlates with neural activity shared by cognitions that depend on optimum catecholamine levels, but catecholamine involvement in conformity has not been tested empirically. Methylphenidate (MPH) is an indirect dopamine and noradrenalin agonist, commonly used for the treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder for which it reduces undesirable behavior as evaluated by peers and authority figures, indicative of increased conformity. We hypothesized that MPH might increase conformity of value. In all, 38 healthy adult females received either a single oral 20 mg dose of MPH or placebo (PL). Each subject rated 153 faces for trustworthiness followed immediately by the face's mean rating from a group of peers. After 30 min and a 2-back continuous-performance working-memory task, subjects were unexpectedly asked to rate all the faces again. Both the groups tended to change their ratings towards the social norm. The MPH group exhibited twice the conformity effect of the PL group following moderate social conflict, but this did not occur following large conflicts. This suggests that MPH might enhance signals that would otherwise be too weak to evoke conformity. MPH did not affect 2-back performance. We provide a new working hypothesis of a neurocognitive mechanism by which MPH reduces socially disruptive behavior. We also provide novel evidence of catecholamine mediation of social learning [corrected].

Indexed as

Social ConformityAdolescentAdultAnalysis of VarianceCase-Control StudiesCentral Nervous System StimulantsDouble-Blind MethodFaceFatigueFemaleHumansMemory, Short-TermMethylphenidateNeuropsychological TestsPattern Recognition, VisualPhotic StimulationCentral Nervous System StimulantsMethylphenidate

Identifiers

PMID22318197
PMCPMC3327856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.