ArticleWork (Reading, Mass.)2012
Considering social ergonomics: the effects of HIT on interpersonal relationships between patients and clinicians.
Article in Work (Reading, Mass.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Developing an evidence base of best practices for integrating computerized systems into the exam room: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017Pooled it
- Impact of Electronic Medical Record Use on the Patient-Doctor Relationship and Communication: A Systematic Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2016Pooled it
- How Do Patients Want Us to Use the Computer During Medical Encounters?-A Discrete Choice Experiment Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2021Article
- Clinically Excellent Use of the Electronic Health Record: Review.JMIR human factors · 2018Review
- Patient Perceptions of Electronic Medical Record Use by Faculty and Resident Physicians: A Mixed Methods Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2016Article
- Computers in the clinical encounter: a scoping review and thematic analysis.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2016Article
- Quantitative ethnographic study of physician workflow and interactions with electronic health record systems.International journal of industrial ergonomics · 2015Article
- Typing skills of physicians in training.Journal of graduate medical education · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study explored physicians' interactions with EHRs to understand the qualities that contribute to patient satisfaction with their use of the technologies and patient satisfaction with physician. Video-taped observations of 100 medical consultations were used to distinguish interaction patterns between physicians and EHRs. Quantified observational methods were used to contribute to ecological validity. Ten primary care physicians and 100 patients from five clinics participated in the study. Visits were videotaped and coded using an objective coding methodology to understand how physicians interacted with electronic health records. Results indicate, a variety of EHR interaction styles may be effective in providing patient-centered care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.