Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22316446›Full record

ArticleThe New England journal of medicine2012

Sources of regional variation in Medicare Part D drug spending.

Julie M Donohue, Nancy E Morden, Walid F Gellad, Julie P Bynum, Weiping Zhou, Joseph T Hanlon, Jonathan Skinner

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New England journal of medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
31.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Drug Diffusion Through Peer Networks: The Influence of Industry Payments.American economic journal. Economic policy · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Visualizing nationwide variation in medicare Part D prescribing patterns.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Julie M DonohueDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA. jdonohue@pitt.edu
Nancy E Morden
Walid F Gellad
Julie P Bynum
Weiping Zhou
Joseph T Hanlon
Jonathan Skinner
Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice · USGeriatric Research Education and Clinical Center · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USVA Pittsburgh Healthcare System · US

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE INSTITUTE: BPCAUL1RR024153 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2006 to 2011
$73.9M
UNDERSTANDING AND IMPROVING EPISODE-BASED HOSPITAL CAREP01AG019783 · NIA · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Alistair James O'MALLEY · 2001 to 2026
$52.9M
University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000005 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2012 to 2015
$50.8M
WOMENS HEALTH ACROSS THE NATION--COORDINATING CENTERU01AG012553 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BROOKS, MARIA MORI · 1994 to 2019
$37.7M
VARIABILITY, STABILITY & SMOOTHNESS OF WALKINGP30AG024827 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JENNIFER S BRACH · 2004 to 2026
$28.6M
University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstitutionKL2TR000146 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2012 to 2015
$8.7M
Pitt Integrated Clinical and Geroscience Research Training ProgramT32AG021885 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Aditi U Gurkar · 2003 to 2026
$6.7M
Intervention to Reduce Dietary Sodium in HemodialysisR01NR010135 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SEVICK, MARY A · 2008 to 2011
$2.3M
Enhancing the Detection and Management of Adverse Drug Events in the Nursing HomeR01HS018721 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI HANDLER, STEVEN MARK · 2010 to 2013
$2.0M
The University of Pittsburgh's Comparative Effectiveness Research Scholars PrograK12HS019461 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KAPOOR, WISHWA N · 2010 to 2010
$1.9M
Improving the Quality of Health Systems for the Very OldK23AG028947 · NIA · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI BYNUM, JULIE PW · 2007 to 2011
$866k
Impact of Medicare Part D on Racial Disparities in Diabetes Treatment and OutcomeR01HS017695 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI DONOHUE, JULIE MARIE · 2009 to 2011
$628k
AHRQ HHS K12 HS019461AHRQ HHS R01 HS017695AHRQ HHS R01 HS018721HSRD VA CDA 09-207NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000146NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000005NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024153NIA NIH HHS AG-07-001NIA NIH HHS K07 AG033174NIA NIH HHS K07AG033174NIA NIH HHS K23 AG028947NIA NIH HHS K23AG028947NIA NIH HHS K23 AG035030NIA NIH HHS P01 AG019783NIA NIH HHS P01AG019783NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024827NIA NIH HHS P30AG024827NIA NIH HHS R01 AG034056NIA NIH HHS R01AG034056NIA NIH HHS R56 AG027017NIA NIH HHS T32 AG021885NIA NIH HHS U01 AG012553NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH082682NINR NIH HHS R01 NR010135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSources of regional variation in spending for prescription drugs under Medicare Part D are poorly understood, and such variation may reflect differences in health status, use of effective treatments, or selection of branded drugs over lower-cost generics.

methodsWe analyzed 2008 Medicare data for 4.7 million beneficiaries for prescription-drug use and expenditures overall and in three drug categories: angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs), 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins), and selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs). Differences in per capita expenditures across hospital-referral regions (HRRs) were decomposed into annual prescription volume and cost per prescription. The ratio of prescriptions filled as branded drugs to all prescriptions filled was calculated. We adjusted all measures for demographic, socioeconomic, and health-status differences.

resultsMean adjusted per capita pharmaceutical spending ranged from $2,413 in the lowest to $3,008 in the highest quintile of HRRs. Most (75.9%) of that difference was attributable to the cost per prescription ($53 vs. $63). Regional differences in cost per prescription explained 87.5% of expenditure variation for ACE inhibitors and ARBs and 56.3% for statins but only 36.1% for SSRIs and SNRIs. The ratio of branded-drug to total prescriptions, which correlated highly with cost per prescription, ranged across HRRs from 0.24 to 0.45 overall and from 0.24 to 0.55 for ACE inhibitors and ARBs, 0.29 to 0.60 for statins, and 0.15 to 0.51 for SSRIs and SNRIs.

conclusionsRegional variation in Medicare Part D spending results largely from differences in the cost of drugs selected rather than prescription volume. A reduction in branded-drug use in some regions through modification of Part D plan benefits might lower costs without reducing quality of care. (Funded by the National Institute on Aging and others.).

Indexed as

Health ExpendituresAgedAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationDrug PrescriptionsFee-for-Service PlansHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMedicare Part DPrescription DrugsSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsUnited StatesAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsPrescription DrugsSelective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID22316446
PMCPMC3285245
OpenAlexW2160862999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.