ArticleThe New England journal of medicine2012
Sources of regional variation in Medicare Part D drug spending.
Article in The New England journal of medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Geographic Variation in Top-10 Prescribed Medicines and Potentially Inappropriate Medication in Portugal: An Ecological Study of 2.2 Million Older Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- County-level variation in cardioprotective antihyperglycemic prescribing among medicare beneficiaries.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2022Article
- Drug Diffusion Through Peer Networks: The Influence of Industry Payments.American economic journal. Economic policy · 2022Article
- Social Determinants of Health and Geographic Variation in Medicare per Beneficiary Spending.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- Geographic Variation in the Prevalence of High-Risk Medication Use Among Medicare Part D Beneficiaries by Hospital Referral Region.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2020Article
- Article
- Association between physician adoption of a new oral anti-diabetic medication and Medicare and Medicaid drug spending.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- Visualizing nationwide variation in medicare Part D prescribing patterns.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2018Article
- Potential Savings in Medicare Part D for Common Urological Conditions.Urology practice · 2018Article
- Impact of Cost-Sharing Increases on Continuity of Specialty Drug Use: A Quasi-Experimental Study.Health services research · 2018Article
- Article
- Variation in Antiosteoporotic Drug Prescribing and Spending Across Spain. A Population-Based Ecological Cross-Sectional Study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2018Article
- Article
- A Multilevel Analysis of Real-World Variations in Oral Anticoagulation Initiation for Atrial Fibrillation in Valencia, a European Region.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2017Article
- Association between payments from manufacturers of pharmaceuticals to physicians and regional prescribing: cross sectional ecological study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2016Article
- Who Were the Early Adopters of Dabigatran?: An Application of Group-based Trajectory Models.Medical care · 2016Article
- Biologic therapy adherence, discontinuation, switching, and restarting among patients with psoriasis in the US Medicare population.Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2016Article
- Regional Variation in Physician Adoption of Antipsychotics: Impact on US Medicare Expenditures.The journal of mental health policy and economics · 2016Article
- Hospital Variation in Premature Clopidogrel Discontinuation After Drug-Eluting Stent Placement in the Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSources of regional variation in spending for prescription drugs under Medicare Part D are poorly understood, and such variation may reflect differences in health status, use of effective treatments, or selection of branded drugs over lower-cost generics.
methodsWe analyzed 2008 Medicare data for 4.7 million beneficiaries for prescription-drug use and expenditures overall and in three drug categories: angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs), 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins), and selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs). Differences in per capita expenditures across hospital-referral regions (HRRs) were decomposed into annual prescription volume and cost per prescription. The ratio of prescriptions filled as branded drugs to all prescriptions filled was calculated. We adjusted all measures for demographic, socioeconomic, and health-status differences.
resultsMean adjusted per capita pharmaceutical spending ranged from $2,413 in the lowest to $3,008 in the highest quintile of HRRs. Most (75.9%) of that difference was attributable to the cost per prescription ($53 vs. $63). Regional differences in cost per prescription explained 87.5% of expenditure variation for ACE inhibitors and ARBs and 56.3% for statins but only 36.1% for SSRIs and SNRIs. The ratio of branded-drug to total prescriptions, which correlated highly with cost per prescription, ranged across HRRs from 0.24 to 0.45 overall and from 0.24 to 0.55 for ACE inhibitors and ARBs, 0.29 to 0.60 for statins, and 0.15 to 0.51 for SSRIs and SNRIs.
conclusionsRegional variation in Medicare Part D spending results largely from differences in the cost of drugs selected rather than prescription volume. A reduction in branded-drug use in some regions through modification of Part D plan benefits might lower costs without reducing quality of care. (Funded by the National Institute on Aging and others.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.