Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22316349›Full record

ReviewDrugs2012

Pharmacokinetics of intravenous ibuprofen: implications of time of infusion in the treatment of pain and fever.

Howard S Smith, Bryan Voss

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02268955 (Assessment of the Analgesic Efficacy of Intravenous Ibuprofen in Biliary Colic), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02268955 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of the Analgesic Efficacy of Intravenous Ibuprofen in Biliary Colic

TypeinterventionalSponsorValleywise HealthRan2014 to 2017Enrolled22ConditionsBiliary ColicArmsIV Ibuprofen, Saline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Zebrafish as model organisms for studying drug-induced liver injury.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2014
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Howard S SmithDepartment of Anesthesiology, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY 12208, USA. SmithH@mail.amc.edu
Bryan Voss
Albany Medical Center Hospital · USCumberland Pharmaceuticals (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intravenous NSAIDs are playing an increasingly large role in analgesia, anti-inflammation and antipyresis in the hospitalized setting. For many years, ketorolac was the only intravenous NSAID available in the US, but in 2009 intravenous ibuprofen was approved by the US FDA for the treatment of pain and fever in adults. In developing intravenous ibuprofen, a range of times of infusion and dosing levels have been utilized and compared with the oral route of administration. The earliest studies utilized a 60-minute infusion, and later a 30-minute infusion was used for the pivotal/registration studies demonstrating efficacy and safety. Another recent trial in healthy volunteers demonstrated a safe and tolerable rapid infusion (5-7 minute) of intravenous ibuprofen. The pharmacokinetic data from all of the clinical trials on 400 and 800 mg doses of intravenous ibuprofen were compiled, and pharmacokinetic modelling was utilized to simulate any data not acquired in the clinical studies. The pharmacokinetic profile of the following doses was modelled: 30-minute infusion of 800 mg intravenous ibuprofen, 5- to 7-minute infusion of 400 mg intravenous ibuprofen and 400 mg ibuprofen oral tablet. These pharmacokinetic analyses revealed that, in general, maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) decreases considerably as the length of the infusion increases and that an oral dose is not able to achieve the C(max) level of any intravenous dose. For the rapid infusion, C(max) was twice that of the oral dose and, as expected, time to C(max) (t(max)) was much more rapid than with the oral dose. However, the oral dose still maintained virtually 100% oral bioavailability. The efficacy of intravenous ibuprofen in terms of pain and fever has also been studied and this review found the drug to be efficacious for both indications. Future areas of study should include assessment of the analgesic and antipyretic efficacy of a rapid (5- to 10-minute) infusion and further assessment of pre-emptive administration of intravenous ibuprofen as part of a multimodal analgesic approach in the surgical setting.

Indexed as

Analgesics, Non-NarcoticAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBiological AvailabilityDose-Response Relationship, DrugFeverHumansIbuprofenInjections, IntravenousPainRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalIbuprofen

Identifiers

PMID22316349
OpenAlexW2246212731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.