Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22316314›Full record

Trial reportTrials2012

Efficacy of vitamin D supplementation in multiple sclerosis (EVIDIMS Trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Jan Dörr, Stephanie Ohlraun, Horst Skarabis, Friedemann Paul

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01440062 phase2terminatednot on this map

Phase II Study of Efficacy of Vitamin D Supplementation in Multiple Sclerosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorCharite University, Berlin, GermanyRan2011 to 2017Enrolled55ConditionsMultiple SclerosisArmsVerum arm receiving Vitamin D oil, low dose arm receiving neutral oil and 400 IU/g of Vitamin D every second day
NCT02740296 completednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Depression and Immune Function in Multiple Sclerosis (MS)

TypeobservationalSponsorCharite University, Berlin, GermanyRan2015 to 2017Enrolled104ConditionsMultiple Sclerosis, Depressive Disorder, MajorArmsNo intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Influence of Diet in Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Vitamin D and Neurological Diseases: An Endocrine View.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Review
  18. Wellness and the Role of Comorbidities in Multiple Sclerosis.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2017
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jan DörrNeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. jan-markus.doerr@charite.de
Stephanie Ohlraun
Horst Skarabis
Friedemann Paul
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEStatistisches Bundesamt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple sclerosis is the most common chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system in young adults. Despite the fact that numerous lines of evidence link both the risk of disease development and the disease course to the serum level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D it still remains elusive whether multiple sclerosis patients benefit from boosting the serum level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D, mainly because interventional clinical trials that directly address the therapeutic effects of vitamin D in multiple sclerosis are sparse. We here present the protocol of an interventional clinical phase II study to test the hypothesis, that high-dose vitamin D supplementation of multiple sclerosis patients is safe and superior to low-dose supplementation with respect to beneficial therapeutic effects. METHODS/

designThe EVIDIMS trial is a German multi-center, stratified, randomized, controlled and double-blind clinical phase II pilot study. Eighty patients with the diagnosis of definite multiple sclerosis or clinically isolated syndrome who are on a stable immunomodulatory treatment with interferon-β1b will be randomized to additionally receive either high-dose (average daily dose 10.200 IU) or low-dose (average daily dose 200 IU) cholecalciferol for a total period of 18 months. The primary outcome measure is the number of new lesions detected on T2-weighted cranial MRI at 3 tesla. Secondary endpoints include additional magnetic resonance imaging and optical coherence tomography parameters for neuroinflammation and -degeneration, clinical parameters for disease activity, as well as cognition, fatigue, depression, and quality of life. Safety and tolerability of high-dose vitamin D supplementation are further outcome parameters. DISCUSSION: In light of the discrepancy between existing epidemiological and preclinical data on the one hand and available clinical data on the other the EVIDIMS trial will substantially contribute to the evaluation of the efficacy of high-dose vitamin D supplementation in MS patients. The study design presented here fulfills the criteria of a high-quality clinical phase II trial in MS.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01440062.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsResearch DesignBrainCholecalciferolDouble-Blind MethodGermanyHumansImmunologic FactorsInterferon-betaInterferon beta-1bMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultiple SclerosisQuality of LifeTime FactorsTomography, Optical CoherenceTreatment OutcomeCholecalciferolImmunologic FactorsInterferon-betaInterferon beta-1b

Identifiers

PMID22316314
PMCPMC3298796
OpenAlexW2106079210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.