GuidelineChest2012
Antithrombotic therapy for atrial fibrillation: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.
Guideline in Chest, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 284 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of Accidents and Their Circumstances With Oral Anticoagulants. The CACAO Study
Optimal Delay Time to Initiate Anticoagulation After Ischemic Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation
Anticoagulant-associated Intracranial Hemorrhage: Patient Characteristics and Outcomes From National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery Manuel Velasco: Single-Center Observational Study
Who cites it
284 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 918 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Updated Meta-Analysis of DOACs vs. VKAs in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Bioprosthetic Heart Valve.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Association Between Atrial Fibrillation and Dementia: A Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2019Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants approved for cardiovascular indications: Systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2018Pooled it
- Atrial fibrillation as a prognostic indicator of myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2017Pooled it
- Direct oral anticoagulant use in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation with valvular heart disease: a systematic review.Clinical cardiology · 2017Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Guideline
- Guideline
- Dabigatran etexilate and risk of myocardial infarction, other cardiovascular events, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2014Pooled it
- The effect of educational intervention on use of psychotropics in defined daily doses and related costs - a randomized controlled trial.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2022Trial
- Apixaban compared to heparin/vitamin K antagonist in patients with atrial fibrillation scheduled for cardioversion: the EMANATE trial.European heart journal · 2018Trial
- Trial
- Incidence of left atrial abnormalities under treatment with dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and vitamin K antagonists.European journal of medical research · 2016Trial
- Trial
- Alternative calculations of individual patient time in therapeutic range while taking warfarin: results from the ROCKET AF trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2015Trial
- Educating orally anticoagulated patients in drug safety: a cluster-randomized study in general practice.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2014Trial
- Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Balancing Embolic Stroke and Intracerebral Hemorrhage Risk in Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- A new score with superior stroke risk prediction in atrial fibrillation: entropy-based information gain approaches in a large nationwide cohort.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2025Review
224 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 11 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe risk of stroke varies considerably across different groups of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Antithrombotic prophylaxis for stroke is associated with an increased risk of bleeding. We provide recommendations for antithrombotic treatment based on net clinical benefit for patients with AF at varying levels of stroke risk and in a number of common clinical scenarios.
methodsWe used the methods described in the Methodology for the Development of Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis Guidelines: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines article of this supplement.
resultsFor patients with nonrheumatic AF, including those with paroxysmal AF, who are (1) at low risk of stroke (eg, CHADS(2) [congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥ 75 years, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack] score of 0), we suggest no therapy rather than antithrombotic therapy, and for patients choosing antithrombotic therapy, we suggest aspirin rather than oral anticoagulation or combination therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel; (2) at intermediate risk of stroke (eg, CHADS(2) score of 1), we recommend oral anticoagulation rather than no therapy, and we suggest oral anticoagulation rather than aspirin or combination therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel; and (3) at high risk of stroke (eg, CHADS(2) score of ≥ 2), we recommend oral anticoagulation rather than no therapy, aspirin, or combination therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel. Where we recommend or suggest in favor of oral anticoagulation, we suggest dabigatran 150 mg bid rather than adjusted-dose vitamin K antagonist therapy.
conclusionsOral anticoagulation is the optimal choice of antithrombotic therapy for patients with AF at high risk of stroke (CHADS(2) score of ≥ 2). At lower levels of stroke risk, antithrombotic treatment decisions will require a more individualized approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.