Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2012
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the novel PAR-1 antagonist vorapaxar in patients with end-stage renal disease.
Trial report in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02475837 (A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Pilot Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Vorapaxar in Maturation of Arteriovenous Fistulae for Hemodialysis Access), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Pilot Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Vorapaxar in Maturation of Arteriovenous Fistulae for Hemodialysis Access
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of more potent antiplatelet therapy with vorapaxar in patients with impaired renal function.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2019Trial
- No Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interaction Between Prasugrel and Vorapaxar Following Multiple-Dose Administration in Healthy Volunteers.Clinical pharmacology in drug development · 2018Trial
- Oral antiplatelet drugs in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD): a review.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2017Review
- Vorapaxar: The Current Role and Future Directions of a Novel Protease-Activated Receptor Antagonist for Risk Reduction in Atherosclerotic Disease.Drugs in R&D · 2017Review
- Impact of selective platelet inhibition in reducing cardiovascular risk - role of vorapaxar.Vascular health and risk management · 2016Review
- Clinical potential of vorapaxar in cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with atherosclerosis.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2015Review
- Vorapaxar: first global approval.Drugs · 2014Review
- Targeting platelet thrombin receptor signaling to prevent thrombosis.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2013Article
- Novel anti-platelet agents: focus on thrombin receptor antagonists.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2013Review
- Vorapaxar: A novel agent to be considered in the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciencesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine whether impaired renal function alters the pharmacokinetics (PK) of vorapaxar or its ability to inhibit thrombin receptor agonist peptide (TRAP)-induced platelet aggregation.
methodsThis was an open-label study in which 8 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis and 7 matched (based on age, gender, weight, and height) healthy controls were administered a single 10-mg oral dose of vorapaxar. Blood samples for vorapaxar PK and pharmacodynamic analysis were collected predose and at frequent intervals up to 6 weeks postdose.
resultsMean vorapaxar bioavailability (based on area under the curve of plasma vorapaxar concentration over time) was identical in the two subject groups; the ESRD/healthy geometric mean ratio (GMR, expressed in percent) was 98. Mean maximum observed plasma concentration (77.4-98.2 ng/mL) was numerically lower in patients with ESRD compared with matched controls (GMR=76; 90% confidence interval=48 to 118). Median time of maximum observed plasma concentration was 2 h in both subject groups. The observed means for elimination half-life were 186 and 231 h in the ESRD and control groups, respectively. Inhibition of platelet aggregation was similar in the two groups. Four out of 15 (27%) subjects reported adverse events, all of which were characterized by the investigator as mild and unrelated to treatment.
conclusionsESRD had no clinically relevant effect on the PK profile of vorapaxar or its ability to inhibit TRAP-induced platelet aggregation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.