Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22315147›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2012

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the novel PAR-1 antagonist vorapaxar in patients with end-stage renal disease.

Teddy Kosoglou, Walter K Kraft, Bharath Kumar, Paul Statkevich, Fengjuan Xuan, Lei Ma, Lisa K Jennings, James E Schiller, Ronald B Langdon, David L Cutler

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02475837 (A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Pilot Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Vorapaxar in Maturation of Arteriovenous Fistulae for Hemodialysis Access), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02475837 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Pilot Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Vorapaxar in Maturation of Arteriovenous Fistulae for Hemodialysis Access

TypeinterventionalSponsorKen MahaffeyRan2015 to 2017Enrolled17ConditionsAV FistulaArmsVorapaxar sulfate, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Novel anti-platelet agents: focus on thrombin receptor antagonists.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2013
    Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Teddy KosoglouMerck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA. teddy.kosoglou2@merck.com
Walter K Kraft
Bharath Kumar
Paul Statkevich
Fengjuan Xuan
Lei Ma
Lisa K Jennings
James E Schiller
Ronald B Langdon
David L Cutler
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USThomas Jefferson University · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine whether impaired renal function alters the pharmacokinetics (PK) of vorapaxar or its ability to inhibit thrombin receptor agonist peptide (TRAP)-induced platelet aggregation.

methodsThis was an open-label study in which 8 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis and 7 matched (based on age, gender, weight, and height) healthy controls were administered a single 10-mg oral dose of vorapaxar. Blood samples for vorapaxar PK and pharmacodynamic analysis were collected predose and at frequent intervals up to 6 weeks postdose.

resultsMean vorapaxar bioavailability (based on area under the curve of plasma vorapaxar concentration over time) was identical in the two subject groups; the ESRD/healthy geometric mean ratio (GMR, expressed in percent) was 98. Mean maximum observed plasma concentration (77.4-98.2 ng/mL) was numerically lower in patients with ESRD compared with matched controls (GMR=76; 90% confidence interval=48 to 118). Median time of maximum observed plasma concentration was 2 h in both subject groups. The observed means for elimination half-life were 186 and 231 h in the ESRD and control groups, respectively. Inhibition of platelet aggregation was similar in the two groups. Four out of 15 (27%) subjects reported adverse events, all of which were characterized by the investigator as mild and unrelated to treatment.

conclusionsESRD had no clinically relevant effect on the PK profile of vorapaxar or its ability to inhibit TRAP-induced platelet aggregation.

Indexed as

Platelet Aggregation InhibitorsAdministration, OralAdolescentAdultAgedArea Under CurveBiological AvailabilityData Interpretation, StatisticalFemaleHumansKidney Failure, ChronicKidney Function TestsLactonesMaleMiddle AgedPlatelet AggregationLactonesPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPyridinesReceptors, Thrombinvorapaxar

Identifiers

PMID22315147
OpenAlexW2065955007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.