Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22314245›Full record

ArticleParasite (Paris, France)2012

Molecular identification of Fasciola spp. (Digenea: Platyhelminthes) in cattle from Vietnam.

S Nguyen, S Amer, M Ichikawa, T Itagaki, Y Fukuda, Y Nakai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasite (Paris, France), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Pilot study on the population genetics structure ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  2. Molecular Characterization ofInfection and drug resistance · 2023
    Article
  3. Potential Hybridization ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Current Status for Controlling the Overlooked Caprine Fasciolosis.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  6. Molecular Characterization ofIranian journal of public health · 2020
    Article
  7. Evaluation of a Commercial Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Kit and In-HouseThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Identification ofJournal of parasitology research · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

S NguyenLaboratory of Sustainable Environmental Biology, Field Centre studies, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, 232-3 Yomogida, Naruko-onsen, Osaki, Miyagi 989-6711, Japan.
S Amer
M Ichikawa
T Itagaki
Y Fukuda
Y Nakai

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fasciola spp. were collected from naturally infected cattle at a local abattoir of Khanh Hoa province, Vietnam, for morphological and genetic investigations. Microscopic examination detected no sperm cells in the seminal vesicles, suggesting a parthenogenetic reproduction of the flukes. Analyses of sequences from the first and second internal transcribed spacers (ITS1 and ITS2) of the ribosomal RNA revealed that 13 out of 16 isolates were of Fasciola gigantica type, whereas three isolates presented a hybrid sequence from F. gigantica and Fasciola hepatica. Interestingly, all the mitochondrial sequences (partial COI and NDI) were of F. gigantica type, suggesting that the maternal lineage of the hybrid form is from F. gigantica. No intra-sequence variation was detected.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceCattleCattle DiseasesDNA, HelminthDNA, MitochondrialDNA, Ribosomal SpacerFasciolaFascioliasisMolecular Sequence DataSequence AlignmentVietnamDNA, HelminthDNA, MitochondrialDNA, Ribosomal Spacer

Identifiers

PMID22314245
PMCPMC3671424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.