Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22312218›Full record

ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2010

Perceptions of risk: understanding cardiovascular disease.

Ruth Webster, Emma Heeley

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05693857 (Patient-Perceived Versus Actual Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Willingness to Follow Recommendations for Cardiovascular Prevention), which is not on this map. Cited by 75 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05693857 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Patient-Perceived Versus Actual Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Willingness to Follow Recommendations for Cardiovascular Prevention

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorChinese University of Hong KongRan2023 to 2028Enrolled1,500ConditionsPatient-Perceived VersusArmsCardiovascular prevention guidelines
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Awareness of cardiovascular risk among persons with type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ruth WebsterCardiovascular Division, The George Institute for International Health, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Emma Heeley

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is still the leading cause of death and disability worldwide despite the availability of well-established and effective preventive options. Accurate perception of a patient's risk by both the patient and the doctors is important as this is one of the components that determine health-related behavior. Doctors tend to not use cardiovascular (CV) risk calculators and underestimate the absolute CV risk of their patients. Patients show optimistic bias when considering their own risk and consistently underestimate it. Poor patient health literacy and numeracy must be considered when thinking about this problem. Patients must possess a reasonably high level of understanding of numerical processes when doctors discuss risk, a level that is not possessed by large numbers of the population. In order to overcome this barrier, doctors need to utilize various tools including the appropriate use of visual aids to accurately communicate risk with their patients. Any intervention has been shown to be better than nothing in improving health understanding. The simple process of repeatedly conveying risk information to a patient has been shown to improve accuracy of risk perception. Doctors need to take responsibility for the accurate assessment and effective communication of CV risk in their patients in order to improve patient uptake of cardioprotective lifestyle choices and preventive medications.

Indexed as

cardioprotective lifestylecardiovascular diseaserisk perception

Identifiers

PMID22312218
PMCPMC3270917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.