Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22311162›Full record

ReviewClinical reviews in allergy & immunology2013

Biologic therapies in the treatment of psoriasis: a comprehensive evidence-based basic science and clinical review and a practical guide to tuberculosis monitoring.

Raja K Sivamani, Heidi Goodarzi, Miki Shirakawa Garcia, Siba P Raychaudhuri, Lisa N Wehrli, Yoko Ono, Emanual Maverakis

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pyoderma gangrenosum.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Cutaneous and visceral leishmaniasis during anti-TNFα therapy.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Raja K SivamaniDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, 3301 C Street, Suite 1400, Sacramento, CA 95816, USA.
Heidi Goodarzi
Miki Shirakawa Garcia
Siba P Raychaudhuri
Lisa N Wehrli
Yoko Ono
Emanual Maverakis

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment of psoriasis has undergone a revolution with the advent of biologic therapies including infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, efalizumab, golimumab, certolizumab, alefacept, secukinumab, abatacept, and ustekinumab. These medications are designed to target specific components of the immune system and are a major technological advancement over traditional immunosuppressive medications. Herein, we present a comprehensive, unbiased comparison of these medications focusing on their differences. For example, TNF antagonists can differ in the way they are dissolved and administered, the effector molecules they can bind, serum peak and trough levels, the types of intracellular signals they can induce, the in vivo complexes that they can form, their protein structure, and their incidence and timing of rare adverse events, among other things. A critical review of the clinical studies that have tested the efficacy of these molecules is also presented including head-to-head comparison trials. The safety of biologics in terms of their long-term adverse events is discussed, as is their use in different types of psoriasis and in different patient populations. Finally, all anti-TNF agents have been associated with a variety of serious and "routine" opportunistic infections, particularly tuberculosis. For this reason, anti-tuberculosis testing both prior to the initiation of a biologic therapy and annually during treatment is pertinent. The uses and limitations of both the tuberculin skin test (TST) and QuantiFeron®-TB Gold (QFT) are discussed, as is the care of patients who present with latent tuberculosis infection prior to the initiation of biologic therapy. Recommendations for tuberculosis monitoring are provided.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalBiological TherapyClinical Trials as TopicEvidence-Based MedicineHumansMonitoring, ImmunologicPopulation GroupsPractice Guidelines as TopicPsoriasisTime FactorsTuberculin TestTuberculosis, PulmonaryTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaAntibodies, MonoclonalTumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.