ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2012
PEG-based bioresponsive hydrogels with redox-mediated formation and degradation.
Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reducible disulfide poly(beta-amino ester) hydrogels for antioxidant delivery.Acta biomaterialia · 2018Article
- Poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels with cell cleavable groups for autonomous cell delivery.Biomaterials · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A hydrogel which will undergo macroscopic transition responding to redox stimuli is prepared. Mercapto precursors are prepared from 4-armed polyethylene glycol and after deprotection of thiolate anions, they can transform into disulfide crosslinked hydrogels within 3 min by responding to oxidant H(2)O(2). Desirable elasticity is exhibited with a wide range of storage modulus from 50 Pa to 14 kPa through rheological investigation. In addition, the hydrogels are found to be hydrolytically stable but degrade within 75 days when exposed to reductant such as glutathione (GSH). So gelation time and degradation behavior can be regulated by concentrations of precursor, oxidant, reductant, temperature, and pH value. Notably, interest arises from the long-period degradation under low GSH concentration of 0.01 mM that is similar to extracellular level, but not the fast disintegration under high concentration intracellular, providing the possibility of "smart" degradation responding to those cell-secreted biomacromolecules during the process of tissue regeneration. Furthermore, both hydrogels and their degradation products show cell viability above 90% culturing with C2C12 cells, representing nontoxic properties. Such a stimuli-responsive degradation strategy will give promising application in tissue repair and regeneration; especially enable the achievement of matching the degradation kinetics with physiological environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.