Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22310913›Full record

ReviewBlood2012

Second malignancies after multiple myeloma: from 1960s to 2010s.

Anish Thomas, Sham Mailankody, Neha Korde, Sigurdur Y Kristinsson, Ingemar Turesson, Ola Landgren

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Blood, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. New cancers after autotransplantations for multiple myeloma.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2015
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Anish ThomasMultiple Myeloma Section, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Sham Mailankody
Neha Korde
Sigurdur Y Kristinsson
Ingemar Turesson
Ola Landgren
National Cancer Institute · USNational Institutes of Health · USKarolinska University Hospital · SESkåne University Hospital · SE

Funding

Molecular and clinical profilingZIABC011352 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI LANDGREN, OLA · 2010 to 2014
$4.4M
Population based studiesZIABC011205 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI LANDGREN, OLA · 2009 to 2014
$858k
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Based on small numbers, recent reports from 3 randomized trials have consistently demonstrated more hematologic malignancies in patients treated with lenalidomide as maintenance (vs placebo). This fact has prompted concern and highlighted the association between multiple myeloma and second malignancies. Furthermore, an excess of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) after multiple myeloma has been known for over 4 decades. Most prior studies have been restricted because of small numbers of patients, inadequate follow-up, and limitations of ascertainment of second malignancies. Although the underlying biologic mechanisms of AML/MDS after multiple myeloma are unknown, treatment-related factors are presumed to be responsible. Recently, an excess risk of AML/MDS was found among 5652 patients with IgG/IgA (but not IgM) monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, supporting a role for disease-related factors. Furthermore, there is evidence to suggest that polymorphisms in germline genes may contribute to a person's susceptibility to subsequent cancers, whereas the potential influence of environmental and behavioral factors remains poorly understood. This review discusses current knowledge regarding second malignancies after multiple myeloma and gives future directions for efforts designed to characterize underlying biologic mechanisms, with the goal to maximize survival and minimize the risk for second malignancies for individual patients.

Indexed as

Multiple MyelomaHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMyelodysplastic SyndromesNeoplasms, Second PrimaryRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID22310913
PMCPMC3327452
OpenAlexW2125701733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.