ArticleInternational journal of obesity (2005)2013
Additive feeding inhibitory and aversive effects of naltrexone and exendin-4 combinations.
Article in International journal of obesity (2005), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Can GLP-1 Be a Target for Reward System Related Disorders? A Qualitative Synthesis and Systematic Review Analysis of Studies on Palatable Food, Drugs of Abuse, and Alcohol.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2020Pooled it
- Opposing neural effects of naltrexone on food reward and aversion: implications for the treatment of obesity.Psychopharmacology · 2014Trial
- Integration of Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Actions Through the Central Amygdala.Endocrinology · 2025Review
- Circulating levels of proglucagon-derived peptides are differentially regulated by the glucagon-like peptide-1 agonist liraglutide and the centrally acting naltrexone/bupropion and can predict future weight loss and metabolic improvements: A 6-month long interventional study.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2023Article
- The administration of Exendin-4 and CCK affects food intake differentially in female and male rats tested on an alternate day fasting paradigm.Neuroscience letters · 2023Article
- Administration of Exendin-4 but not CCK alters lick responses and trial initiation to sucrose and intralipid during brief-access tests.Chemical senses · 2022Article
- The role of the gut microbiome in opioid use.Behavioural pharmacology · 2020Review
- Effects of peripheral administration of a Neuromedin U receptor 2-selective agonist on food intake and body weight in obese mice.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2017Article
- GLP-1 Based Combination Therapy for Obesity and Diabetes.Journal of obesity & metabolic syndrome · 2017Article
- Exendin-4 reduces food intake via the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in the hypothalamus.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Preparation of exenatide-loaded linear poly(ethylene glycol)-brush poly(l-lysine) block copolymer: potential implications on diabetic nephropathy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2017Article
- Long term exendin-4 treatment reduces food intake and body weight and alters expression of brain homeostatic and reward markers.Endocrinology · 2014Article
- Behavioural profile of exendin-4/naltrexone dose combinations in male rats during tests of palatable food consumption.Psychopharmacology · 2014Article
- Maternal high-fat diet during pregnancy and lactation reduces the appetitive behavioral component in female offspring tested in a brief-access taste procedure.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2014Article
- Palatable food avoidance and acceptance learning with different stressors in female rats.Neuroscience · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveOne developing strategy for obesity treatment has been to use combinations of differently acting pharmacotherapies to improve weight loss with fewer adverse effects. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the combination of naltrexone (Nal), an opioid antagonist acting on the reward system, and exendin-4 (Ex-4), a glucagon-like peptide 1 agonist acting on satiety signaling, would produce larger reductions in food intake than either alone in rats. Because the anorectic potencies of both compounds have been associated with nausea and malaise, the influence of these drug combinations on the acquisition of a conditioned taste aversion (CTA) was also determined.
methodsIn Experiment 1, the acute anorectic effects of Nal (0.32-3.2 mg kg(-1); intraperitoneally (i.p.)) and Ex-4 (1-10 μg kg(-1); i.p.) were assessed alone or in combination. Combinational doses were further investigated by the repeated daily administration of 1 mg kg(-1) Nal+3.2 μg kg(-1) Ex-4 for 4 days. In Experiment 2, both compounds alone or in combination were used as unconditioned stimuli in a series of CTA tests.
resultsNal and Ex-4, alone or in combination, suppressed food intake in a dose-dependent manner, and the interaction on food intake between Nal and Ex-4 was additive. In the CTA paradigm, Nal (1 mg kg(-1)) alone did not support acquisition, whereas a CTA was evident with doses of Ex-4 (1 or 3.2 μg kg(-1)). Combinations of Nal and Ex-4 also resulted in a more rapid and robust acquisition of a CTA.
conclusionGiven that the Nal and Ex-4 combination produces additive effects on not only food intake reduction but also food aversion learning, this specific drug combination does not have the benefit of minimizing the adverse effects associated with each individual drug. These data suggest that it is necessary to evaluate both the positive and adverse effects at early stages of combinational drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.