Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22310215›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Urology2012

Pediatric urolithiasis: causative factors, diagnosis and medical management.

Funda Baştuğ, Ruhan Düşünsel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Evaluation of ChatGPT-4oUrolithiasis · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Urinary stone disease in Syrian children.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funda BaştuğErciyes University Medical Faculty, Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Talas Street, 38039 Kayseri, Turkey. fundadr@hotmail.com
Ruhan Düşünsel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Childhood urolithiasis is associated with considerable morbidity and recurrence. Many risk factors--including those metabolic, genetic, anatomic, dietary and environmental in nature--have been identified in children with urinary tract calculi. As pediatric urolithiasis with a metabolic etiology is the most common disease, evaluating the metabolic risk factors in patients is necessary to both effectively treat current stones and prevent recurrence. We discuss causative risk factors of pediatric urolithiasis, as well as the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.

Indexed as

Age FactorsChildDisease ManagementHumansMetabolic DiseasesRisk FactorsUrolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID22310215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.