ArticleJournal of women's health (2002)2012
Perinatal depression screening and intervention: enhancing health provider involvement.
Article in Journal of women's health (2002), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Uptake of referrals for women with positive perinatal depression screening results and the effectiveness of interventions to increase uptake: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences · 2020Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Integrated Care Interventions Addressing Perinatal Depression Care in Ambulatory Obstetric Care Settings.Clinical obstetrics and gynecology · 2018Pooled it
- Text And Telephone Screening And Referral Improved Detection And Treatment Of Maternal Mental Health Conditions.Health affairs (Project Hope) · 2024Trial
- Antenatal depression: Efficacy of a pre-post therapy study and repercussions in motor development of children during the first 18 months postpartum. Study: "Pregnancy care, healthy baby".Journal of psychiatric research · 2022Trial
- Study protocol for a comparative effectiveness trial of two models of perinatal integrated psychosocial assessment: the PIPA project.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2017Trial
- Examining the role of social determinants of health in maternal mental health screening and treatment engagement during the perinatal period.Biology of sex differences · 2025Article
- Improving the Management of Maternal Mental Health with Digital Health Care.Psychiatric research and clinical practice · 2024Article
- A critical need for the concept of matrescence in perinatal psychiatry.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Results of a Statewide Survey of Obstetric Clinician Depression Practices.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2022Article
- Article
- The impact of our images: psychological implications in expectant parents after a prenatal diagnosis.Pediatric radiology · 2020Review
- The PRogram In Support of Moms (PRISM): study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial of two active interventions addressing perinatal depression in obstetric settings.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2019Article
- Clusters of Behavioral Health and Psychosocial Risk for Childbearing Women in Four Virginia Communities.Maternal and child health journal · 2019Article
- Patients with Postpartum Depression in Gynaecological Practices in Germany - Results of a Representative Survey of Local Gynaecologists about Diagnosis and Management.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2016Article
- Perinatal Anxiety and Depression in Minority Women.MCN. The American journal of maternal child nursingArticle
- Adaptive Leadership in Parents Caring for their Children Born with Life-Threatening Conditions.Journal of pediatric nursingArticle
- Patient's views on depression care in obstetric settings: how do they compare to the views of perinatal health care professionals?General hospital psychiatryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe authors of this study collaborated in the analysis of public health survey data in order to inform future statewide interventions that could systematically enhance depression screening and mental health service use for women of reproductive age. The primary objective of the study was to empirically inform and test the program theory components of a motivational interviewing intervention that we anticipate will guide statewide practice and policy priorities.
methodsData were examined from a survey of healthcare practitioners statewide (n=1498) regarding their practices with and perceptions of perinatal depression care for women. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to measure two latent constructs: health provider confidence in the ability to diagnose and treat and the importance placed on screening and treatment. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to test a program theory supporting motivational interviewing using a model implied relationship between confidence and importance on screening and treatment/referral practices.
resultsThe data fit the model; the model provisionally supports motivational interviewing as an intervention influencing provider attitudes and practices surrounding perinatal depression screening and treatment/referral.
conclusionsUltimately, study findings support statewide public health efforts to expand the role of health providers in recognizing and responding to perinatal depression and suggest that motivational interviewing techniques that augment importance and confidence may lead to enhanced screening and referral/treatment outcomes for pregnant and postpartum women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.