ReviewStem cells and development2012
Solving the "X" in embryos and stem cells.
Review in Stem cells and development, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Silencing XIST on the future active X: Searching human and bovine preimplantation embryos for the repressor.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2024Article
- The X-factor in ART: does the use of assisted reproductive technologies influence DNA methylation on the X chromosome?Human genomics · 2023Article
- Epigenetic Reprogramming and Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Review
- Sex at the interface: the origin and impact of sex differences in the developing human placenta.Biology of sex differences · 2022Review
- Memories of an X-chromosome.Stem cell investigation · 2017Article
- Achilles' heel of pluripotent stem cells: genetic, genomic and epigenetic variations during prolonged culture.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2016Review
- Deficiency of the placenta- and yolk sac-specific tristetraprolin family member ZFP36L3 identifies likely mRNA targets and an unexpected link to placental iron metabolism.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2016Article
- Influence of Sex on Basal and Dickkopf-1 Regulated Gene Expression in the Bovine Morula.PloS one · 2015Article
- Genotype-specific effects of Mecp2 loss-of-function on morphology of Layer V pyramidal neurons in heterozygous female Rett syndrome model mice.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2015Article
- Understanding the X chromosome inactivation cycle in mice: a comprehensive view provided by nuclear transfer.Epigenetics · 2014Article
- Generation of naive-like porcine-induced pluripotent stem cells capable of contributing to embryonic and fetal development.Stem cells and development · 2013Article
- Pivots of pluripotency: the roles of non-coding RNA in regulating embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) is a complex epigenetic process that ensures that most X-linked genes are expressed equally for both sexes. Female eutherian mammals inactivate randomly the maternal or paternal inherited X-chromosome early in embryogenesis, whereas the extra-embryonic tissues experience an imprinting XCI that results in the inactivation of the paternal X-chromosome in mice. Although the phenomenon was initially described 40 years ago, many aspects remain obscure. In the last 2 years, some trademark publications have shed new light on the ongoing debate regarding the timing and mechanism of imprinted or random XCI. It has been observed that XCI is not accomplished at the blastocyst stage in bovines, rabbits, and humans, contrasting with the situation reported in mice, the standard model. All the species present 2 active X-chromosomes (Xa) in the early epiblast of the blastocyst, the cellular source for embryonic stem cells (ESCs). In this perspective, it would make sense to expect an absence of XCI in undifferentiated ESCs, but human ESCs are highly heterogeneous for this parameter and the presence of 2 Xa has been proposed as a true hallmark of ground-state pluripotency and a quality marker for female ESCs. Similarly, XCI reversal in female induced pluripotent stem cells is a key reprogramming event on the path to achieve the naïve pluripotency, and key pluripotency regulators can interact directly or indirectly with Xist. Finally, the presence of 2 Xa may lead to a sex-specific transcriptional regulation resulting in sexual dimorphism in reprogramming and differentiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.