Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22309139›Full record

ArticleAlcoholism, clinical and experimental research2012

Ethanol tolerance and withdrawal severity in high drinking in the dark selectively bred mice.

John C Crabbe, Alexandre M Colville, Lauren C Kruse, Andy J Cameron, Stephanie E Spence, Jason P Schlumbohm, Lawrence C Huang, Pamela Metten

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Rodent models of genetic contributions to motivation to abuse alcohol.Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation · 2014
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John C CrabbePortland Alcohol Research Center, Department of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health, Portland, OR 97239, USA. crabbe@ohsu.edu
Alexandre M Colville
Lauren C Kruse
Andy J Cameron
Stephanie E Spence
Jason P Schlumbohm
Lawrence C Huang
Pamela Metten
Portland VA Medical Center · US

Funding

Translational measures of risk for excessive alcohol consumptionP60AA010760 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Suzanne S. Fei · 2006 to 2026
$34.5M
BIOLOGICAL BASES OF ALCOHOLISMT32AA007468 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Andrey E Ryabinin · 1987 to 2026
$11.3M
Selective Breeding for Drinking in the Circadian DarkU01AA013519 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Angela Renee Ozburn · 2001 to 2026
$10.9M
THERMAL AND METABOLIC DYSFUNCTION DURING WITHDRAWALP50AA010760 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI CRABBE, JOHN C. · 1996 to 2005
$10.7M
NIAAA NIH HHS AA010760NIAAA NIH HHS AA013519NIAAA NIH HHS AA07468NIAAA NIH HHS P50 AA010760NIAAA NIH HHS P60 AA010760NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007468NIAAA NIH HHS U01 AA013519
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMouse lines are being selectively bred in replicate for high blood ethanol concentrations (BECs) achieved after limited access of ethanol (EtOH) drinking early in the circadian dark phase. High Drinking in the Dark-1 (HDID-1) mice are in selected generation S21, and the replicate HDID-2 line in generation S14. Tolerance and withdrawal symptoms are 2 of the 7 diagnostic criteria for alcohol dependence. Withdrawal severity has been found in mouse studies to be negatively genetically correlated with EtOH preference drinking.

methodsTo determine other traits genetically correlated with high DID, we compared naïve animals from both lines with the unselected, segregating progenitor stock, HS/Npt. Differences between HDID-1 and HS would imply commonality of genetic influences on DID and these traits.

resultsFemale HDID-1 and HDID-2 mice tended to develop less tolerance than HS to EtOH hypothermia after their third daily injection. A trend toward greater tolerance was seen in the HDID males. HDID-1, HDID-2, and control HS lines did not differ in the severity of acute or chronic withdrawal from EtOH as indexed by the handling-induced convulsion (HIC). Both HDID-1 and HDID-2 mice tended to have greater HIC scores than HS regardless of drug treatment.

conclusionsThese results show that tolerance to EtOH's hypothermic effects may share some common genetic control with reaching high BECs after DID, a finding consistent with other data regarding genetic contributions to EtOH responses. Withdrawal severity was not negatively genetically correlated with DID, unlike its correlation with preference drinking, underscoring the genetic differences between preference drinking and DID. HDID lines showed greater basal HIC scores than HS, suggestive of greater central nervous system excitability.

Indexed as

BreedingSeverity of Illness IndexAlcohol DrinkingAnimalsCircadian RhythmDrug ToleranceEthanolFemaleMaleMiceMice, Mutant StrainsMice, TransgenicSpecies SpecificitySubstance Withdrawal SyndromeEthanol

Identifiers

PMID22309139
PMCPMC3349804
OpenAlexW2084935003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.