Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22309035›Full record

ArticleACS nano2012

Delivery of small interfering RNA by peptide-targeted mesoporous silica nanoparticle-supported lipid bilayers.

Carlee E Ashley, Eric C Carnes, Katharine E Epler, David P Padilla, Genevieve K Phillips, Robert E Castillo, Dan C Wilkinson, Brian S Wilkinson, Cameron A Burgard, Robin M Kalinich and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS nano, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 232 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carlee E AshleyBiotechnology and Bioengineering Department, Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, California 94551-0969, USA. ceashle@sandia.gov or
Eric C Carnes
Katharine E Epler
David P Padilla
Genevieve K Phillips
Robert E Castillo
Dan C Wilkinson
Brian S Wilkinson
Cameron A Burgard
Robin M Kalinich
Jason L Townson
Bryce Chackerian
Cheryl L Willman
David S Peabody
Walker Wharton
C Jeffrey Brinker
University of New Mexico · USNew Mexico Cancer Center · USSandia National Laboratories · US

Funding

NATIONAL CENTER FOR DESIGN:BIOMIMETIC NANOCONDUCTOR(RMI)PN2EY016570 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI JAKOBSSON, ERIC G · 2005 to 2009
$6.6M
Scientific Core: Acquisition, Synthesis, and Characterization of NanomaterialsU19ES019528 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI NEL, ANDRE ELIAS · 2010 to 2014
$5.5M
Peptide-directed protocells and virus-like particles-new nanoparticle platforms fU01CA151792 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI BRINKER, C JEFFREY, WILLMAN, CHERYL LYNN · 2010 to 2014
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS 1U01CA151792-01NCI NIH HHS U01 CA151792NEI NIH HHS 2 PN2 EY016570BNEI NIH HHS PN2 EY016570NIEHS NIH HHS 1U19ES019528-01NIEHS NIH HHS U19 ES019528
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The therapeutic potential of small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) is severely limited by the availability of delivery platforms that protect siRNA from degradation, deliver it to the target cell with high specificity and efficiency, and promote its endosomal escape and cytosolic dispersion. Here we report that mesoporous silica nanoparticle-supported lipid bilayers (or "protocells") exhibit multiple properties that overcome many of the limitations of existing delivery platforms. Protocells have a 10- to 100-fold greater capacity for siRNA than corresponding lipid nanoparticles and are markedly more stable when incubated under physiological conditions. Protocells loaded with a cocktail of siRNAs bind to cells in a manner dependent on the presence of an appropriate targeting peptide and, through an endocytic pathway followed by endosomal disruption, promote delivery of the silencing nucleotides to the cytoplasm. The expression of each of the genes targeted by the siRNAs was shown to be repressed at the protein level, resulting in a potent induction of growth arrest and apoptosis. Incubation of control cells that lack expression of the antigen recognized by the targeting peptide with siRNA-loaded protocells induced neither repression of protein expression nor apoptosis, indicating the precise specificity of cytotoxic activity. In terms of loading capacity, targeting capabilities, and potency of action, protocells provide unique attributes as a delivery platform for therapeutic oligonucleotides.

Indexed as

AnimalsApoptosisCell LineCell ProliferationGene SilencingHumansLipid BilayersModels, MolecularMolecular ConformationNanoparticlesPeptidesPorosityRNA, Small InterferingSilicon DioxideTransfectionLipid BilayersPeptidesRNA, Small InterferingSilicon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID22309035
PMCPMC3332089
OpenAlexW1995220749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.