ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2012
H5N1 influenza viruses: facts, not fear.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.
- An inactivated, adjuvanted whole virion clade 2.2 H5N1 (A/Chicken/Astana/6/05) influenza vaccine is safe and immunogenic in a single dose in humans.Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI · 2013Trial
- Deliberating the scientific evidence base for influenza transmission to raw milk consumers.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2025Review
- Article
- A novel framework for inferring parameters of transmission from viral sequence data.PLoS genetics · 2018Article
- Influenza.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2018Review
- Why Do Exceptionally Dangerous Gain-of-Function Experiments in Influenza?Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2018Review
- Does influenza pandemic preparedness and mitigation require gain-of-function research?Influenza and other respiratory viruses · 2017Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Studies on influenza virus transmission between ferrets: the public health risks revisited.mBio · 2015Article
- Article
- Article
- From cases to capacity? A critical reflection on the role of 'ethical dilemmas' in the development of dual-use governance.Science and engineering ethics · 2014Article
- Ethical alternatives to experiments with novel potential pandemic pathogens.PLoS medicine · 2014Article
- Emerging antiviral strategies to interfere with influenza virus entry.Medicinal research reviews · 2014Review
- H5N1 vaccines in humans.Virus research · 2013Review
- Amaryllidaceae alkaloids inhibit nuclear-to-cytoplasmic export of ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus H5N1.Influenza and other respiratory viruses · 2013Article
- Electron microscopy: essentials for viral structure, morphogenesis and rapid diagnosis.Science China. Life sciences · 2013Review
- Editorial commentary: pandemic H5N1: receding risk or coming catastrophe?Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ongoing controversy over publication of two studies involving the transmission in ferrets of H5N1 (H5) subtype influenza viruses and the recommendations of the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity to redact key details in the manuscripts call for an examination of relevant scientific facts. In addition, there are calls in the media to destroy the viruses, curtail future research in this area, and protect the public from such "frightening" research efforts. Fear needs to be put to rest with solid science and not speculation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.