Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22308474›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2012

H5N1 influenza viruses: facts, not fear.

Peter Palese, Taia T Wang

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Deliberating the scientific evidence base for influenza transmission to raw milk consumers.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Influenza.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2018
    Review
  6. Why Do Exceptionally Dangerous Gain-of-Function Experiments in Influenza?Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2018
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. H5N1 vaccines in humans.Virus research · 2013
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Editorial commentary: pandemic H5N1: receding risk or coming catastrophe?Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter PaleseDepartment of Microbiology and Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029, USA. peter.palese@mssm.edu
Taia T Wang
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ongoing controversy over publication of two studies involving the transmission in ferrets of H5N1 (H5) subtype influenza viruses and the recommendations of the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity to redact key details in the manuscripts call for an examination of relevant scientific facts. In addition, there are calls in the media to destroy the viruses, curtail future research in this area, and protect the public from such "frightening" research efforts. Fear needs to be put to rest with solid science and not speculation.

Indexed as

AnimalsFearFerretsHumansInfluenza A Virus, H5N1 SubtypeInfluenza, HumanMicroscopy, ElectronZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID22308474
PMCPMC3289294
OpenAlexW1973334755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.