Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22308351›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2012

Foraging alters resilience/vulnerability to sleep disruption and starvation in Drosophila.

Jeffrey Donlea, Averi Leahy, Matthew S Thimgan, Yasuko Suzuki, Bryon N Hughson, Marla B Sokolowski, Paul J Shaw

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A carnitine transporter at the blood-brain barrier modulates sleep via glial lipid metabolism inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Expression of theJournal of neurogenetics · 2021
    Article
  6. TheJournal of neurogenetics · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. A sleep-like state inScience advances · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Sleep inFrontiers in physiology · 2019
    Review
  17. Sleep regulates visual selective attention inThe Journal of experimental biology · 2018
    Article
  18. G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jeffrey DonleaDepartment of Anatomy & Neurobiology, Washington University in St Louis, MO 63104, USA.
Averi Leahy
Matthew S Thimgan
Yasuko Suzuki
Bryon N Hughson
Marla B Sokolowski
Paul J Shaw
Washington University in St. Louis · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS OF SLEEP HOMEOSTASIS IN DROSOPHILAR01NS051305 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SHAW, PAUL J · 2005 to 2023
$6.1M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS051305
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent human studies suggest that genetic polymorphisms allow an individual to maintain optimal cognitive functioning during sleep deprivation. If such polymorphisms were not associated with additional costs, selective pressures would allow these alleles to spread through the population such that an evolutionary alternative to sleep would emerge. To determine whether there are indeed costs associated with resiliency to sleep loss, we challenged natural allelic variants of the foraging gene (for) with either sleep deprivation or starvation. Flies with high levels of Protein Kinase G (PKG) (for(R)) do not display deficits in short-term memory following 12 h of sleep deprivation. However, short-term memory is significantly disrupted when for(R) flies are starved overnight. In contrast, flies with low levels of PKG (for(s), for(s2)) show substantial deficits in short-term memory following sleep deprivation but retain their ability to learn after 12 h of starvation. We found that for(R) phenotypes could be largely recapitulated in for(s) flies by selectively increasing the level of PKG in the α/β lobes of the mushroom bodies, a structure known to regulate both sleep and memory. Together, these data indicate that whereas the expression of for may appear to provide resilience in one environmental context, it may confer an unexpected vulnerability in other situations. Understanding how these tradeoffs confer resilience or vulnerability to specific environmental challenges may provide additional clues as to why an evolutionary alternative to sleep has not emerged.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalFeeding BehaviorSleepStarvationAnimalsDrosophila

Identifiers

PMID22308351
PMCPMC3289360
OpenAlexW2104000397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.