Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22308193›Full record

ArticleStatistics and its interface2011

Practical Consideration of Genotype Imputation: Sample Size, Window Size, Reference Choice, and Untyped Rate.

Boshao Zhang, Degui Zhi, Kui Zhang, Guimin Gao, Nita N Limdi, Nianjun Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics and its interface, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Accurate Imputation of Untyped Variants from Deep Sequencing Data.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. References for Haplotype Imputation in the Big Data Era.Molecular biology (Los Angeles, Calif.) · 2015
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Boshao ZhangDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294.
Degui Zhi
Kui Zhang
Guimin Gao
Nita N Limdi
Nianjun Liu

Funding

Predictors of hemorrhage among patients on direct acting oral anticoagulantsR01HL092173 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI LIMDI, NITA A · 2008 to 2023
$10.4M
Genome Wide Haplotype Association AnalysisR01GM081488 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI LIU, NIANJUN · 2008 to 2012
$1.3M
Haplotyping and QTL Mapping in Pedigrees with Missing DataR01GM073766 · NIGMS · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI GAO, GUIMIN · 2007 to 2011
$1.3M
Haplotype Analysis in Linkage Disequilibrium MappingR01GM074913 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI ZHANG, KUI · 2006 to 2010
$1.1M
Pharmacogenetic Optimization of Anticoagulation TherapyK23NS045598 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI LIMDI, NITA A · 2003 to 2007
$795k
Algorithms for protein superfamily classification and function predictionR00RR024163 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI ZHI, DEGUI · 2009 to 2011
$740k
NCRR NIH HHS R00 RR024163NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL092173NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM073766NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM074913NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081488NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS045598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imputation offers a promising way to infer the missing and/or untyped genotypes in genetic studies. In practice, however, many factors may affect the quality of imputation. In this study, we evaluated the influence of untyped rate, sizes of the study sample and the reference sample, window size, and reference choice (for admixed population), as the factors affecting the quality of imputation. The results show that in order to obtain good imputation quality, it is necessary to have an untyped rate less than 50%, a reference sample size greater than 50, and a window size of greater than 500 SNPs (roughly 1 MB in base pairs). Compared with the whole-region imputation, piecewise imputation with large-enough window sizes provides improved efficacy. For an admixed study sample, if only an external reference panel is used, it should include samples from the ancestral populations that represent the admixed population under investigation. Internal references are strongly recommended. When internal references are limited, however, augmentation by external references should be used carefully. More specifically, augmentation with samples from the major source populations of the admixture can lower the quality of imputation; augmentation with seemingly genetically unrelated cohorts may improve the quality of imputation.

Identifiers

PMID22308193
PMCPMC3269888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.