Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22307566›Full record

Trial reportCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2012

Soy isoflavone supplementation for breast cancer risk reduction: a randomized phase II trial.

Seema A Khan, Robert T Chatterton, Nancy Michel, Michelle Bryk, Oukseub Lee, David Ivancic, Richard Heinz, Carola M Zalles, Irene B Helenowski, Borko D Jovanovic and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 171 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Chemopreventive and therapeutic effects ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Drug repurposing for cancer therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024
    Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Seema A KhanDepartment of Surgery, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago IL 60611, USA. skhan@nmh.org
Robert T Chatterton
Nancy Michel
Michelle Bryk
Oukseub Lee
David Ivancic
Richard Heinz
Carola M Zalles
Irene B Helenowski
Borko D Jovanovic
Adrian A Franke
Maarten C Bosland
Jun Wang
Nora M Hansen
Kevin P Bethke
Alexander Dew
Margerie Coomes
Raymond C Bergan
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · USUniversity of Hawaii System · USNorthwestern University · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

University of Hawaii Cancer Center CCSGP30CA071789 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI Xin Chen · 1996 to 2026
$56.2M
Community Clinical Oncology Program: FL Pediatric CCOPU10CA035157 · NCI · FLORIDA ASSN OF PEDIATRIC TUMOR PROG · PI TALBERT, JAMES L · 1985 to 2014
$5.0M
PHASE 1 AND PHASE 2 CLINICAL TRIALS OF CANCER CHEMOPREVENTIVE AGENTS-261035157N01CN035157 · CN · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI BERGAN, RAYMOND C · 2004 to 2006
–
NCI NIH HHS N01 CN035157NCI NIH HHS N01-CN-35157NCI NIH HHS P30 CA071789
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soy isoflavone consumption may protect against breast cancer development. We conducted a phase IIB trial of soy isoflavone supplementation to examine its effect on breast epithelial proliferation and other biomarkers in the healthy high-risk breast. One hundred and twenty-six consented women underwent a random fine-needle aspiration (rFNA); those with 4,000 or more epithelial cells were randomized to a double-blind 6-month intervention of mixed soy isoflavones (PTIG-2535) or placebo, followed by repeat rFNA. Cells were examined for Ki-67 labeling index and atypia. Expression of 28 genes related to proliferation, apoptosis, and estrogenic effect was measured using quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR. Hormone and protein levels were measured in nipple aspirate fluid (NAF). All statistical tests were two-sided. Ninety-eight women were evaluable for Ki-67 labeling index. In 49 treated women, the median Ki-67 labeling index was 1.18 at entry and 1.12 post intervention, whereas in 49 placebo subjects, it was 0.97 and 0.92 (P for between-group change: 0.32). Menopausal stratification yielded similar results between groups, but within premenopausal soy-treated women, Ki-67 labeling index increased from 1.71 to 2.18 (P = 0.04). We saw no treatment effect on cytologic atypia or NAF parameters. There were significant increases in the expression of 14 of 28 genes within the soy, but not the control group, without significant between-group differences. Plasma genistein values showed excellent compliance. A 6-month intervention of mixed soy isoflavones in healthy, high-risk adult Western women did not reduce breast epithelial proliferation, suggesting a lack of efficacy for breast cancer prevention and a possible adverse effect in premenopausal women.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsAdultBiopsy, Fine-NeedleBreast NeoplasmsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGlycine maxHumansIsoflavonesMiddle AgedPrognosisRisk Reduction BehaviorIsoflavones

Identifiers

PMID22307566
PMCPMC3333836
OpenAlexW2140424776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.