Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22307204›Full record

ArticleProtoplasma2013

Phylogenetic comparison among the heterocystous cyanobacteria based on a polyphasic approach.

Arun Kumar Mishra, Ekta Shukla, Satya Shila Singh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Protoplasma, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Phylogenetic analysis of heterocystous cyanobacteria (Subsections IV and V) using highly iterated palindromes as molecular markers.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2014
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Arun Kumar MishraLaboratory of Microbial genetics, Department of Botany, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, India. akmishraau@rediffmail.com
Ekta Shukla
Satya Shila Singh

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phylogenetic comparison has been done among the selected heterocystous cyanobacteria belonging to the sections IV and V. The hierarchical cluster analysis based on antibiotics sensitivity showed a distant relationship between the members of Nostocales and Stigonematales. Thus, multiple antibiotic resistance pattern used as marker provide easy, fast, and reliable method for strain discrimination and genetic variability. However, morphological, physiological (both based on principal component analysis) and biochemical analysis grouped true branching cyanobacteria along with the members of section IV. Molecular analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences revealed that Hapalosiphon welwitschii and Westiellopsis sp. were grouped in cluster I whereas Scytonema bohnerii, a false branching genera showed a close proximity with Calothrix brevissima in cluster II. Cluster III of clade 2 included Nostoc calcicola and Anabaena oryzae which proved the heterogeneity at the generic level. Cluster IV the largest group of clade 2 based on 16S rRNA gene sequences includes six strains of the genera Nostoc, Anabaena, and Cylindrospermum showing ambiguous evolutionary relationship. In cluster IV, Anabaena sp. and Anabaena doliolum were phylogenetically linked by sharing 99% sequence similarity. Probably, they were of the same genetic makeup but appear differently under the diverse physiological conditions. Section IV showed polyphyletic origin whereas section V showed monophyletic origin. Results suggested that either morphological or physiological or biochemical or molecular attribute is not sufficient to provide true diversity and phylogeny of the cyanobacteria at the generic level and thus, a polyphasic approach would be more appropriate and reliable.

Indexed as

CyanobacteriaPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.