Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22307178›Full record

ArticleLeukemia2012

Standardization of flow cytometry in myelodysplastic syndromes: a report from an international consortium and the European LeukemiaNet Working Group.

T M Westers, R Ireland, W Kern, C Alhan, J S Balleisen, P Bettelheim, K Burbury, M Cullen, J A Cutler, M G Della Porta and 29 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
16.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 244 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Detection of Cancer Stem Cells in Normal and Dysplastic/Leukemic Human Blood.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

39 authors at 20 institutions in 11 countries.

T M WestersDepartment of Hematology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
R Ireland
W Kern
C Alhan
J S Balleisen
P Bettelheim
K Burbury
M Cullen
J A Cutler
M G Della Porta
A M Dräger
J Feuillard
P Font
U Germing
D Haase
U Johansson
S Kordasti
M R Loken
L Malcovati
J G te Marvelde
S Matarraz
T Milne
B Moshaver
G J Mufti
K Ogata
A Orfao
A Porwit
K Psarra
S J Richards
D Subirá
V Tindell
T Vallespi
P Valent
V H J van der Velden
T M de Witte
D A Wells
F Zettl
M C Béné
A A van de Loosdrecht
King's College Hospital · GBAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLErasmus MC · NLHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DERadboud University Nijmegen · NLSt James's University Hospital · GBUniversidad de Salamanca · ESUniversity of Göttingen · DEUniversity of Pavia · ITCentre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy · FREvangelismos Hospital · GRHôpital Dupuytren · FRHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESHospital Universitario de Guadalajara · ESKarolinska University Hospital · SEKrankenhaus der Elisabethinen · ATMedical University of Vienna · ATMunich Leukemia Laboratory (Germany) · DENippon Medical School · JPPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flow cytometry (FC) is increasingly recognized as an important tool in the diagnosis and prognosis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). However, validation of current assays and agreement upon the techniques are prerequisites for its widespread acceptance and application in clinical practice. Therefore, a working group was initiated (Amsterdam, 2008) to discuss and propose standards for FC in MDS. In 2009 and 2010, representatives from 23, mainly European, institutes participated in the second and third European LeukemiaNet (ELN) MDS workshops. In the present report, minimal requirements to analyze dysplasia are refined. The proposed core markers should enable a categorization of FC results in cytopenic patients as 'normal', 'suggestive of', or 'diagnostic of' MDS. An FC report should include a description of validated FC abnormalities such as aberrant marker expression on myeloid progenitors and, furthermore, dysgranulopoiesis and/or dysmonocytopoiesis, if at least two abnormalities are evidenced. The working group is dedicated to initiate further studies to establish robust diagnostic and prognostic FC panels in MDS. An ultimate goal is to refine and improve diagnosis and prognostic scoring systems. Finally, the working group stresses that FC should be part of an integrated diagnosis rather than a separate technique.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBone MarrowFlow CytometryHumansImmunophenotypingInternational AgenciesMyelodysplastic SyndromesPractice Guidelines as TopicPrognosisReference StandardsSocieties, ScientificBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID22307178
OpenAlexW2098258699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.