Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22307059›Full record

ReviewProgress in neurobiology2013

Insights into cortical mechanisms of behavior from microstimulation experiments.

Mark H Histed, Amy M Ni, John H R Maunsell

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Progress in neurobiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 145 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Critical scaling of novelty in the cortex.Nature communications · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Neural population dynamics of direct electrical stimulation of neocortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Symmetry in Frontal But Not Motor and Somatosensory Cortical Projections.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Symmetry in frontal but not motor and somatosensory cortical projections.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Neuronal Spiking Responses to Direct Electrical Microstimulation in the Human Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  19. Neural Plasticity in Sensorimotor Brain-Machine Interfaces.Annual review of biomedical engineering · 2023
    Review
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark H HistedDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, 220 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Amy M Ni
John H R Maunsell
Harvard University · US

Funding

Viral ModuleP30EY012196 · NEI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI MARGARET S LIVINGSTONE · 1998 to 2026
$21.3M
Visual Processing in the Cerebral CortexR01EY005911 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI MAUNSELL, JOHN H.R. · 1986 to 2025
$6.2M
RESEARCH TRAINING IN VISUAL NEUROSCIENCET32EY007110 · NEI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI BORN, RICHARD T · 1988 to 2023
$4.1M
Neuronal Measures of the State of Visual AttentionR01EY021550 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI MAUNSELL, JOHN H.R. · 2011 to 2013
$1.2M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY012196NEI NIH HHS R01 EY005911NEI NIH HHS R01EY005911NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021550NEI NIH HHS R01EY021550NEI NIH HHS T32 EY007110
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Even the simplest behaviors depend on a large number of neurons that are distributed across many brain regions. Because electrical microstimulation can change the activity of localized subsets of neurons, it has provided valuable evidence that specific neurons contribute to particular behaviors. Here we review what has been learned about cortical function from behavioral studies using microstimulation in animals and humans. Experiments that examine how microstimulation affects the perception of stimuli have shown that the effects of microstimulation are usually highly specific and can be related to the stimuli preferred by neurons at the stimulated site. Experiments that ask subjects to detect cortical microstimulation in the absence of other stimuli have provided further insights. Although subjects typically can detect microstimulation of primary sensory or motor cortex, they are generally unable to detect stimulation of most of cortex without extensive practice. With practice, however, stimulation of any part of cortex can become detected. These training effects suggest that some patterns of cortical activity cannot be readily accessed to guide behavior, but that the adult brain retains enough plasticity to learn to process novel patterns of neuronal activity arising anywhere in cortex.

Indexed as

AnimalsCerebral CortexElectric StimulationHumansNeuronal PlasticityPerception

Identifiers

PMID22307059
PMCPMC3535686
OpenAlexW1963651478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.