Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22306558›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2012

Invited commentary: the action in the interaction and exposure modification.

David C Christiani

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

David C ChristianiHarvard School of Public Health, 665 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA. dchris@hsph.harvard.edu
Harvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of disease variability in populations is a goal of modern epidemiology. Because most common diseases arise out of a combination of factors and events (exposures, heritability, comorbidities, and chance), developing simple models of characterizing joint events is a daunting task. Dr. Weinberg argues successfully in this issue of the Journal (Am J Epidemiol. 2012;175(7):602-605) that additive null models can capture pure forms of independent causal effects in studies of rare conditions. Moreover, the concept of exposure modification, which characterizes most gene-environment interactions reported to date, is introduced. More cross-talk between biologists and epidemiologists is needed to tackle key issues in chronic disease etiology, and the argument for the use of parsimonious joint models in epidemiology is convincing.

Indexed as

Gene-Environment InteractionHumans

Identifiers

PMID22306558
OpenAlexW2171583109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.